samba: backport patches for cross-compiling

* Adds a new mode for samba cross-compiling:

  When both --cross-answers and --cross-execute are set, this means:
  - Use cross-answers
  - If answer is unknown, then instead of adding UNKNOWN to the cross-answers
    file and failing configure, the new mode runs cross-execute to determine the
    answer and adds that to the cross-answers file.

* And some fixes and improvements for cross-compiling.

Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang <jackie.huang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe MacDonald <joe_macdonald@mentor.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jackie Huang
2016-01-06 14:42:47 +08:00
committed by Joe MacDonald
parent 51c35fca0f
commit d43819eb04
8 changed files with 554 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
From 1b32c7d7f148bcf2598799b21dfa3ba1ed824d32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Uri Simchoni <urisimchoni@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 21:12:06 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] waf: sanitize and fix added cross answer
When configuring samba for cross-compilation using the cross-answers
method, the function add_answer receives the standard output and exit code
of a configuration test and updates the cross-answers file accordingly.
This patch sanitizes the standard output to conform to the cross-answers
file format - one line of output. It also adds a missing newline.
(Note - at this point add_answer is only ever called with empty output
but this change is significant for the reminder of this patchset)
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <urisimchoni@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
Upstream-Status: Backport
Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang <jackie.huang@windriver.com>
---
buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py b/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py
index 3838e34..fc1d78e 100644
--- a/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py
+++ b/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py
@@ -19,6 +19,16 @@ def add_answer(ca_file, msg, answer):
except:
Logs.error("Unable to open cross-answers file %s" % ca_file)
sys.exit(1)
+ (retcode, retstring) = answer
+ # if retstring is more than one line then we probably
+ # don't care about its actual content (the tests should
+ # yield one-line output in order to comply with the cross-answer
+ # format)
+ retstring = retstring.strip()
+ if len(retstring.split('\n')) > 1:
+ retstring = ''
+ answer = (retcode, retstring)
+
if answer == ANSWER_OK:
f.write('%s: OK\n' % msg)
elif answer == ANSWER_UNKNOWN:
@@ -26,8 +36,7 @@ def add_answer(ca_file, msg, answer):
elif answer == ANSWER_FAIL:
f.write('%s: FAIL\n' % msg)
else:
- (retcode, retstring) = answer
- f.write('%s: (%d, "%s")' % (msg, retcode, retstring))
+ f.write('%s: (%d, "%s")\n' % (msg, retcode, retstring))
f.close()
--
1.9.1
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
From add52538b9a0ccf66ca87c7a691bf59901765849 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Uri Simchoni <urisimchoni@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 21:15:19 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] Adds a new mode to samba cross-compiling.
When both --cross-answers and --cross-execute are set, this means:
- Use cross-answers
- If answer is unknown, then instead of adding UNKNOWN to the cross-answers
file and failing configure, the new mode runs cross-execute to determine the
answer and adds that to the cross-answers file.
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <urisimchoni@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
Upstream-Status: Backport
Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang <jackie.huang@windriver.com>
---
buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py b/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py
index fc1d78e..3f1ef12 100644
--- a/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py
+++ b/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py
@@ -45,7 +45,6 @@ def cross_answer(ca_file, msg):
try:
f = open(ca_file, 'r')
except:
- add_answer(ca_file, msg, ANSWER_UNKNOWN)
return ANSWER_UNKNOWN
for line in f:
line = line.strip()
@@ -78,7 +77,6 @@ def cross_answer(ca_file, msg):
else:
raise Utils.WafError("Bad answer format '%s' in %s" % (line, ca_file))
f.close()
- add_answer(ca_file, msg, ANSWER_UNKNOWN)
return ANSWER_UNKNOWN
@@ -86,24 +84,47 @@ class cross_Popen(Utils.pproc.Popen):
'''cross-compilation wrapper for Popen'''
def __init__(*k, **kw):
(obj, args) = k
-
- if '--cross-execute' in args:
- # when --cross-execute is set, then change the arguments
- # to use the cross emulator
- i = args.index('--cross-execute')
- newargs = args[i+1].split()
- newargs.extend(args[0:i])
- args = newargs
- elif '--cross-answers' in args:
+ use_answers = False
+ ans = ANSWER_UNKNOWN
+
+ # Three possibilities:
+ # 1. Only cross-answers - try the cross-answers file, and if
+ # there's no corresponding answer, add to the file and mark
+ # the configure process as unfinished.
+ # 2. Only cross-execute - get the answer from cross-execute
+ # 3. Both - try the cross-answers file, and if there is no
+ # corresponding answer - use cross-execute to get an answer,
+ # and add that answer to the file.
+ if '--cross-answers' in args:
# when --cross-answers is set, then change the arguments
# to use the cross answers if available
+ use_answers = True
i = args.index('--cross-answers')
ca_file = args[i+1]
msg = args[i+2]
ans = cross_answer(ca_file, msg)
+
+ if '--cross-execute' in args and ans == ANSWER_UNKNOWN:
+ # when --cross-execute is set, then change the arguments
+ # to use the cross emulator
+ i = args.index('--cross-execute')
+ newargs = args[i+1].split()
+ newargs.extend(args[0:i])
+ if use_answers:
+ p = real_Popen(newargs,
+ stdout=Utils.pproc.PIPE,
+ stderr=Utils.pproc.PIPE)
+ ce_out, ce_err = p.communicate()
+ ans = (p.returncode, ce_out)
+ add_answer(ca_file, msg, ans)
+ else:
+ args = newargs
+
+ if use_answers:
if ans == ANSWER_UNKNOWN:
global cross_answers_incomplete
cross_answers_incomplete = True
+ add_answer(ca_file, msg, ans)
(retcode, retstring) = ans
args = ['/bin/sh', '-c', "echo -n '%s'; exit %d" % (retstring, retcode)]
real_Popen.__init__(*(obj, args), **kw)
@@ -124,7 +145,8 @@ def SAMBA_CROSS_ARGS(conf, msg=None):
if conf.env.CROSS_EXECUTE:
ret.extend(['--cross-execute', conf.env.CROSS_EXECUTE])
- elif conf.env.CROSS_ANSWERS:
+
+ if conf.env.CROSS_ANSWERS:
if msg is None:
raise Utils.WafError("Cannot have NULL msg in cross-answers")
ret.extend(['--cross-answers', os.path.join(Options.launch_dir, conf.env.CROSS_ANSWERS), msg])
--
1.9.1
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
From f7052d633396005563e44509428503f42c9faa97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jackie Huang <jackie.huang@windriver.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 01:00:11 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] waf: improve readability of cross-answers generated by cross-execute
When generating a result for cross-answers from the (retcode, retstring) tuple:
- (0, "output") indicated as "output"
- 1 is interpreted as generic fail code, instead of 255, because most
if not all tests fail with 1 as exit code rather than 255
- For failing test, use NO instead of FAIL, because that's not
necessarily a failure (it could mean that something is NOT
broken)
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <urisimchoni@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
Upstream-Status: Backport
Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang <jackie.huang@windriver.com>
---
buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py b/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py
index 3f1ef12..d1e7006 100644
--- a/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py
+++ b/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ from Configure import conf
real_Popen = None
ANSWER_UNKNOWN = (254, "")
-ANSWER_FAIL = (255, "")
+ANSWER_NO = (1, "")
ANSWER_OK = (0, "")
cross_answers_incomplete = False
@@ -33,10 +33,13 @@ def add_answer(ca_file, msg, answer):
f.write('%s: OK\n' % msg)
elif answer == ANSWER_UNKNOWN:
f.write('%s: UNKNOWN\n' % msg)
- elif answer == ANSWER_FAIL:
- f.write('%s: FAIL\n' % msg)
+ elif answer == ANSWER_NO:
+ f.write('%s: NO\n' % msg)
else:
- f.write('%s: (%d, "%s")\n' % (msg, retcode, retstring))
+ if retcode == 0:
+ f.write('%s: "%s"\n' % (msg, retstring))
+ else:
+ f.write('%s: (%d, "%s")\n' % (msg, retcode, retstring))
f.close()
@@ -64,7 +67,7 @@ def cross_answer(ca_file, msg):
return ANSWER_UNKNOWN
elif ans == "FAIL" or ans == "NO":
f.close()
- return ANSWER_FAIL
+ return ANSWER_NO
elif ans[0] == '"':
return (0, ans.strip('"'))
elif ans[0] == "'":
--
1.9.1
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
From 8ffb1892b5c42d8d29124d274aa4b5f1726d7e9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 10:18:16 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] build: make wafsamba CHECK_SIZEOF cross-compile friendly
Use the same trick as commit 0d9bb86293c9d39298786df095c73a6251b08b7e
We do the same array trick iteratively starting from 1 (byte) by powers
of 2 up to 32.
The new 'critical' option is used to make the invocation die or not
according to each test.
The default is True since normally it's expected to find a proper
result and should error out if not.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Upstream-Status: Backport
Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang <jackie.huang@windriver.com>
---
buildtools/wafsamba/samba_autoconf.py | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_autoconf.py b/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_autoconf.py
index fe110bd..59953d9 100644
--- a/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_autoconf.py
+++ b/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_autoconf.py
@@ -304,23 +304,27 @@ def CHECK_FUNCS(conf, list, link=True, lib=None, headers=None):
@conf
-def CHECK_SIZEOF(conf, vars, headers=None, define=None):
+def CHECK_SIZEOF(conf, vars, headers=None, define=None, critical=True):
'''check the size of a type'''
- ret = True
for v in TO_LIST(vars):
v_define = define
+ ret = False
if v_define is None:
v_define = 'SIZEOF_%s' % v.upper().replace(' ', '_')
- if not CHECK_CODE(conf,
- 'printf("%%u", (unsigned)sizeof(%s))' % v,
- define=v_define,
- execute=True,
- define_ret=True,
- quote=False,
- headers=headers,
- local_include=False,
- msg="Checking size of %s" % v):
- ret = False
+ for size in list((1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32)):
+ if CHECK_CODE(conf,
+ 'static int test_array[1 - 2 * !(((long int)(sizeof(%s))) <= %d)];' % (v, size),
+ define=v_define,
+ quote=False,
+ headers=headers,
+ local_include=False,
+ msg="Checking if size of %s == %d" % (v, size)):
+ conf.DEFINE(v_define, size)
+ ret = True
+ break
+ if not ret and critical:
+ Logs.error("Couldn't determine size of '%s'" % v)
+ sys.exit(1)
return ret
@conf
--
1.9.1
@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
From 81379b6b14ea725c72953be2170b382403ed8728 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 10:18:15 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] build: unify and fix endian tests
Unify the endian tests out of lib/ccan/wscript into wafsamba since
they're almost cross-compile friendly.
While at it fix them to be so by moving the preprocessor directives out
of main scope since that will fail.
And keep the WORDS_BIGENDIAN, HAVE_LITTLE_ENDIAN and HAVE_BIG_ENDIAN
defines separate because of different codebases.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Upstream-Status: Backport
Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang <jackie.huang@windriver.com>
---
buildtools/wafsamba/wscript | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
lib/ccan/wscript | 55 --------------------------------------
2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
diff --git a/buildtools/wafsamba/wscript b/buildtools/wafsamba/wscript
index 7984227..1a2cfe6 100755
--- a/buildtools/wafsamba/wscript
+++ b/buildtools/wafsamba/wscript
@@ -390,9 +390,68 @@ def configure(conf):
else:
conf.define('SHLIBEXT', "so", quote=True)
- conf.CHECK_CODE('long one = 1; return ((char *)(&one))[0]',
- execute=True,
- define='WORDS_BIGENDIAN')
+ # First try a header check for cross-compile friendlyness
+ conf.CHECK_CODE(code = """#ifdef __BYTE_ORDER
+ #define B __BYTE_ORDER
+ #elif defined(BYTE_ORDER)
+ #define B BYTE_ORDER
+ #endif
+
+ #ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+ #define LITTLE __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+ #elif defined(LITTLE_ENDIAN)
+ #define LITTLE LITTLE_ENDIAN
+ #endif
+
+ #if !defined(LITTLE) || !defined(B) || LITTLE != B
+ #error Not little endian.
+ #endif
+ int main(void) { return 0; }""",
+ addmain=False,
+ headers="endian.h sys/endian.h",
+ define="HAVE_LITTLE_ENDIAN")
+ conf.CHECK_CODE(code = """#ifdef __BYTE_ORDER
+ #define B __BYTE_ORDER
+ #elif defined(BYTE_ORDER)
+ #define B BYTE_ORDER
+ #endif
+
+ #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
+ #define BIG __BIG_ENDIAN
+ #elif defined(BIG_ENDIAN)
+ #define BIG BIG_ENDIAN
+ #endif
+
+ #if !defined(BIG) || !defined(B) || BIG != B
+ #error Not big endian.
+ #endif
+ int main(void) { return 0; }""",
+ addmain=False,
+ headers="endian.h sys/endian.h",
+ define="HAVE_BIG_ENDIAN")
+
+ if not conf.CONFIG_SET("HAVE_BIG_ENDIAN") and not conf.CONFIG_SET("HAVE_LITTLE_ENDIAN"):
+ # That didn't work! Do runtime test.
+ conf.CHECK_CODE("""union { int i; char c[sizeof(int)]; } u;
+ u.i = 0x01020304;
+ return u.c[0] == 0x04 && u.c[1] == 0x03 && u.c[2] == 0x02 && u.c[3] == 0x01 ? 0 : 1;""",
+ addmain=True, execute=True,
+ define='HAVE_LITTLE_ENDIAN',
+ msg="Checking for HAVE_LITTLE_ENDIAN - runtime")
+ conf.CHECK_CODE("""union { int i; char c[sizeof(int)]; } u;
+ u.i = 0x01020304;
+ return u.c[0] == 0x01 && u.c[1] == 0x02 && u.c[2] == 0x03 && u.c[3] == 0x04 ? 0 : 1;""",
+ addmain=True, execute=True,
+ define='HAVE_BIG_ENDIAN',
+ msg="Checking for HAVE_BIG_ENDIAN - runtime")
+
+ # Extra sanity check.
+ if conf.CONFIG_SET("HAVE_BIG_ENDIAN") == conf.CONFIG_SET("HAVE_LITTLE_ENDIAN"):
+ Logs.error("Failed endian determination. The PDP-11 is back?")
+ sys.exit(1)
+ else:
+ if conf.CONFIG_SET("HAVE_BIG_ENDIAN"):
+ conf.DEFINE('WORDS_BIGENDIAN', 1)
# check if signal() takes a void function
if conf.CHECK_CODE('return *(signal (0, 0)) (0) == 1',
diff --git a/lib/ccan/wscript b/lib/ccan/wscript
index a0b5406..5b3a910 100644
--- a/lib/ccan/wscript
+++ b/lib/ccan/wscript
@@ -25,61 +25,6 @@ def configure(conf):
conf.CHECK_CODE('int __attribute__((used)) func(int x) { return x; }',
addmain=False, link=False, cflags=conf.env['WERROR_CFLAGS'],
define='HAVE_ATTRIBUTE_USED')
- # We try to use headers for a compile-time test.
- conf.CHECK_CODE(code = """#ifdef __BYTE_ORDER
- #define B __BYTE_ORDER
- #elif defined(BYTE_ORDER)
- #define B BYTE_ORDER
- #endif
-
- #ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
- #define LITTLE __LITTLE_ENDIAN
- #elif defined(LITTLE_ENDIAN)
- #define LITTLE LITTLE_ENDIAN
- #endif
-
- #if !defined(LITTLE) || !defined(B) || LITTLE != B
- #error Not little endian.
- #endif""",
- headers="endian.h sys/endian.h",
- define="HAVE_LITTLE_ENDIAN")
- conf.CHECK_CODE(code = """#ifdef __BYTE_ORDER
- #define B __BYTE_ORDER
- #elif defined(BYTE_ORDER)
- #define B BYTE_ORDER
- #endif
-
- #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
- #define BIG __BIG_ENDIAN
- #elif defined(BIG_ENDIAN)
- #define BIG BIG_ENDIAN
- #endif
-
- #if !defined(BIG) || !defined(B) || BIG != B
- #error Not big endian.
- #endif""",
- headers="endian.h sys/endian.h",
- define="HAVE_BIG_ENDIAN")
-
- if not conf.CONFIG_SET("HAVE_BIG_ENDIAN") and not conf.CONFIG_SET("HAVE_LITTLE_ENDIAN"):
- # That didn't work! Do runtime test.
- conf.CHECK_CODE("""union { int i; char c[sizeof(int)]; } u;
- u.i = 0x01020304;
- return u.c[0] == 0x04 && u.c[1] == 0x03 && u.c[2] == 0x02 && u.c[3] == 0x01 ? 0 : 1;""",
- addmain=True, execute=True,
- define='HAVE_LITTLE_ENDIAN',
- msg="Checking for HAVE_LITTLE_ENDIAN - runtime")
- conf.CHECK_CODE("""union { int i; char c[sizeof(int)]; } u;
- u.i = 0x01020304;
- return u.c[0] == 0x01 && u.c[1] == 0x02 && u.c[2] == 0x03 && u.c[3] == 0x04 ? 0 : 1;""",
- addmain=True, execute=True,
- define='HAVE_BIG_ENDIAN',
- msg="Checking for HAVE_BIG_ENDIAN - runtime")
-
- # Extra sanity check.
- if conf.CONFIG_SET("HAVE_BIG_ENDIAN") == conf.CONFIG_SET("HAVE_LITTLE_ENDIAN"):
- Logs.error("Failed endian determination. The PDP-11 is back?")
- sys.exit(1)
conf.CHECK_CODE('return __builtin_choose_expr(1, 0, "garbage");',
link=True,
--
1.9.1
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
From 5413f97290d3126262eb309ecbcf7769509f2a11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jackie Huang <jackie.huang@windriver.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 00:48:35 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] avoid using colon in the checking msg
Upstream-Status: Pending
colon is used as the separator when parse from
a answers file, the colon here makes it never
get the right answer.
Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang <jackie.huang@windriver.com>
---
wscript_configure_system_mitkrb5 | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/wscript_configure_system_mitkrb5 b/wscript_configure_system_mitkrb5
index a62d00b..a2d89f0 100644
--- a/wscript_configure_system_mitkrb5
+++ b/wscript_configure_system_mitkrb5
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ conf.CHECK_CODE('''
''',
'HAVE_WRFILE_KEYTAB',
headers='krb5.h', lib='krb5', execute=True,
- msg="Checking whether the WRFILE:-keytab is supported");
+ msg="Checking whether the WRFILE -keytab is supported");
# Check for KRB5_DEPRECATED handling
conf.CHECK_CODE('''#define KRB5_DEPRECATED 1
#include <krb5.h>''',
--
1.9.1
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
From 649c731526dc1473bd1804d2903d7559e63616da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Uri Simchoni <urisimchoni@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 09:12:45 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] waf: Fix parsing of cross-answers file in case answer includes a colon
The answer provided in the cross-answers file may include a colon,
as in:
Checking uname version type: "#57-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jul 15 03:51:08 UTC 2014"
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <urisimchoni@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
Upstream-Status: Backport
Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang <jackie.huang@windriver.com>
---
buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py b/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py
index d1e7006..7961212 100644
--- a/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py
+++ b/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_cross.py
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ def cross_answer(ca_file, msg):
if line == '' or line[0] == '#':
continue
if line.find(':') != -1:
- a = line.split(':')
+ a = line.split(':', 1)
thismsg = a[0].strip()
if thismsg != msg:
continue
--
1.9.1
@@ -34,6 +34,13 @@ SRC_URI = "${SAMBA_MIRROR}/stable/samba-${PV}.tar.gz \
file://19-systemd-daemon-is-contained-by-libsystemd.patch \
file://20-do-not-import-target-module-while-cross-compile.patch \
file://21-add-config-option-without-valgrind.patch \
file://0001-waf-sanitize-and-fix-added-cross-answer.patch \
file://0002-Adds-a-new-mode-to-samba-cross-compiling.patch \
file://0003-waf-improve-readability-of-cross-answers-generated-b.patch \
file://0004-build-make-wafsamba-CHECK_SIZEOF-cross-compile-frien.patch \
file://0005-build-unify-and-fix-endian-tests.patch \
file://0006-avoid-using-colon-in-the-checking-msg.patch \
file://0007-waf-Fix-parsing-of-cross-answers-file-in-case-answer.patch \
"
SRC_URI[md5sum] = "232016d7581a1ba11e991ec2674553c4"