* last release was 2011
* it fails on autobuilder
* nothing uses it
Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
Package PN is not created otherwise and results in errors like
| Problem: conflicting requests
| - nothing provides libsrtp = 1.5.2-r0 needed by libsrtp-dev-1.5.2-r0.i586
when PN-staticdev is to be installed that RDEPENDS on it.
Signed-off-by: Anuj Mittal <anuj.mittal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING: openhpi-3.6.1-r0 do_patch:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
Applying patch openhpi-use-serial-tests-config-needed-by-ptest.patch
patching file configure.ac
Hunk #1 succeeded at 7 with fuzz 2.
Now at patch openhpi-use-serial-tests-config-needed-by-ptest.patch
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING: libdivecomputer-0.4.2+gitrAUTOINC+5f765f9143-r0 do_patch:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
Applying patch fix-ar.patch
patching file configure.ac
Hunk #1 succeeded at 54 with fuzz 1 (offset 30 lines).
Now at patch fix-ar.patch
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING: openipmi-2.0.24-r0 do_patch:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
Applying patch include_sys_types.patch
patching file ui/ui.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 42 with fuzz 1.
Now at patch include_sys_types.patch
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING: net-snmp-5.7.3-r0 do_patch:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
Applying patch 0001-BUG-a2584-Fix-snmptrap-to-use-clientaddr-from-snmp.c.patch
patching file snmplib/transports/snmpUDPIPv6Domain.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 286 with fuzz 2 (offset 30 lines).
Now at patch 0001-BUG-a2584-Fix-snmptrap-to-use-clientaddr-from-snmp.c.patch
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING: python-grpcio-1.8.4-r0 do_patch:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
Applying patch 0001-setup.py-Do-not-mix-C-and-C-compiler-options.patch
patching file setup.py
Hunk #1 succeeded at 115 with fuzz 2 (offset -1 lines).
Now at patch 0001-setup.py-Do-not-mix-C-and-C-compiler-options.patch
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING: anthy-9100h-r0 do_patch:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
Applying patch not_build_elc.patch
patching file src-util/Makefile.am
Hunk #1 succeeded at 8 with fuzz 2 (offset 2 lines).
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING: libnetfilter-cthelper-1.0.0-r0 do_patch:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
Applying patch libnetfilter-cthelper-visibility-hidden.patch
patching file doxygen.cfg.in
patching file src/internal.h
patching file src/libnetfilter_cthelper.c
Hunk #2 succeeded at 118 with fuzz 2.
Now at patch libnetfilter-cthelper-visibility-hidden.patch
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING: postgresql-9.4.15-r0 do_patch:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
Applying patch remove.autoconf.version.check.patch
patching file configure.in
Hunk #1 succeeded at 19 with fuzz 2.
Now at patch remove.autoconf.version.check.patch
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING: nginx-1.12.2-r0 do_patch:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
Applying patch nginx-cross.patch
patching file auto/feature
patching file auto/options
Hunk #1 succeeded at 386 (offset 33 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 580 (offset 35 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 599 (offset 22 lines).
patching file auto/types/sizeof
patching file auto/unix
Hunk #1 succeeded at 587 (offset 194 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 604 with fuzz 1 (offset 188 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 620 with fuzz 2 (offset 188 lines).
Now at patch nginx-cross.patch
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING: webmin-1.850-r0 do_patch:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
Applying patch nfs-export.patch
patching file exports/save_export.cgi
Hunk #1 succeeded at 50 (offset 10 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 87 with fuzz 2 (offset 17 lines).
Now at patch nfs-export.patch
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING: hddtemp-0.3-beta15-r1 do_patch:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
Applying patch hddtemp_0.3-beta15-52.diff
patching file doc/hddtemp.8
patching file po/fr.po
patching file po/ru.po
patching file po/sv.po
patching file po/pt.po
patching file po/de.po
patching file po/LINGUAS
patching file po/hddtemp.pot
patching file src/sata.c
patching file src/satacmds.c
patching file src/backtrace.c
patching file src/daemon.c
patching file src/hddtemp.c
Hunk #5 succeeded at 268 with fuzz 2 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 283 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 295 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 372 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #9 succeeded at 409 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #10 succeeded at 483 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #11 succeeded at 496 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #12 succeeded at 510 (offset 4 lines).
Hunk #13 succeeded at 532 (offset 4 lines).
patching file src/ata.c
patching file src/hddtemp.h
patching file src/scsicmds.c
Now at patch hddtemp_0.3-beta15-52.diff
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING: syslog-ng-3.8.1-r0 do_patch:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
Applying patch configure.ac-add-option-enable-thread-tls-to-manage-.patch
patching file configure.ac
Hunk #1 succeeded at 147 with fuzz 2 (offset 27 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 489 (offset 105 lines).
Now at patch configure.ac-add-option-enable-thread-tls-to-manage-.patch
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING: apache2-2.4.29-r0 do_patch:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
Applying patch apache-configure_perlbin.patch
patching file configure.in
Hunk #1 succeeded at 855 with fuzz 2 (offset 217 lines).
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
checking file configure.ac
Hunk #1 succeeded at 7 with fuzz 2.
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
checking file utils/cec-compliance/Makefile.am
checking file utils/cec-ctl/Makefile.am
Hunk #1 succeeded at 6 (offset -1 lines).
checking file utils/cec-follower/Makefile.am
Hunk #1 succeeded at 7 with fuzz 1.
checking file utils/qv4l2/Makefile.am
checking file utils/v4l2-compliance/Makefile.am
checking file utils/v4l2-ctl/Makefile.am
and more
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
checking file Makefile.in
Hunk #1 succeeded at 18 with fuzz 1.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 150 (offset -1 lines).
checking file examples/Makefile.in
checking file lib/Makefile.in
checking file lib/t1lib/Makefile.in
checking file lib/type1/Makefile.in
checking file type1afm/Makefile.in
checking file xglyph/Makefile.in
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
checking file tests/test_import.py
Hunk #4 succeeded at 122 with fuzz 1.
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
checking file Makefile.am
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 2.
amoung others
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
checking file configure.in
Hunk #1 succeeded at 698 with fuzz 2 (off
and others
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
checking file configure.in
checking file daemon/module.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 19 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 55 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line).
checking file include/automount.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 51 (offset 1 line).
WARNING:
among others
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
checking file src/libstrongswan/plugins/openssl/openssl_diffie_hellman.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 192 (offset 50 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 255 with fuzz 1 (offset 58 lines).
checking file src/libstrongswan/plugins/openssl/openssl_diffie_hellman.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 43 (offset -1 lines).
checking file src/libstrongswan/plugins/openssl/openssl_plugin.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 609 (offset 221 lines).
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
checking file src/discovery.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 472 with fuzz 1 (offset 96 lines)
among others
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
ARNING:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
checking file configure.ac
Hunk #1 succeeded at 27 with fuzz 1 (offset 8 lines).
and others
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING: xserver-common-1.34-r9 do_patch:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
Applying patch 0001-Don-t-install-Xsession-or-Xserver.patch
patching file Makefile
Hunk #1 succeeded at 20 with fuzz 1.
and others
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING: ctdb-2.5.6-r0 do_patch:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
Applying patch 02-link-rep_snprintf-for-ltdbtool.patch
patching file Makefile.in
Hunk #1 succeeded at 176 with fuzz 2 (offset 6 lines).
Now at patch 02-link-rep_snprintf-for-ltdbtool.patch
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
checking file Makefile
checking file configure
Hunk #3 succeeded at 232 (offset -4 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 356 (offset -5 lines).
checking file src/vlock-main.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 112 with fuzz 1 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 184 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 194 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 223 (offset 1 line).
among others
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
checking file dbusmock/__init__.py
Hunk #1 succeeded at 14 with fuzz 1.
checking file dbusmock/mockobject.py
Hunk #1 succeeded at 688 (offset 6 lines).
and others
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
patching file plugins/mas.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 30 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line).
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
checking file scm/Makefile.am
Hunk #1 succeeded at 119 with fuzz 2 (offset 61 lines).
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
patching file configure
Hunk #1 succeeded at 535 with fuzz 1 (offset 96 lines).
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
checking file Makefile
Hunk #1 succeeded at 29 with fuzz 1 (offset 5 lines).
and others
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
checking file build/make/configure.sh
Hunk #1 succeeded at 581 with fuzz 2 (offset 137 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 616 (offset 27 lines).
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
patching file stress-fcntl.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 415 with fuzz 2 (offset 2 lines).
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
checking file scripts/sms3
Hunk #1 succeeded at 24 with fuzz 2.
plus more
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
WARNING:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
1. Upgrade to version 0.4 and rename from _git to exact version _0.4
2. Fix build issues with musl libc
Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John <maxin.john@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
Armin Kuster
Andreas Müller
Anuj Mittal
Jackie Huang
Maxin John