vincent/aptly
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/aptly-dev/aptly.git synced 2026-06-04 05:10:40 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Refactoring: use checksums instead of MD5 for pool/published

Browse Source 
This is related to #506

As a first step, don't pass MD5 explicitly, pass checksum info object,
so that as a next step we can choose which hash to use.

There should be no functional changes so far.

Next step: stop returning explicit paths from public package pool.
This commit is contained in:
Andrey Smirnov
2017-04-01 00:09:34 +03:00
parent 675d35c7a1
commit 50cf2b49bd
16 changed files with 77 additions and 53 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
deb/package_test.go
+3 -3
View File
@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ func (s *PackageSuite) TestLinkFromPool(c *C) {
publishedStorage := files.NewPublishedStorage(c.MkDir())
p := NewPackageFromControlFile(s.stanza)
poolPath, _ := packagePool.Path(p.Files()[0].Filename, p.Files()[0].Checksums.MD5)
poolPath, _ := packagePool.Path(p.Files()[0].Filename, p.Files()[0].Checksums)
err := os.MkdirAll(filepath.Dir(poolPath), 0755)
c.Assert(err, IsNil)
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ func (s *PackageSuite) TestDownloadList(c *C) {
packagePool := files.NewPackagePool(c.MkDir())
p := NewPackageFromControlFile(s.stanza)
p.Files()[0].Checksums.Size = 5
poolPath, _ := packagePool.Path(p.Files()[0].Filename, p.Files()[0].Checksums.MD5)
poolPath, _ := packagePool.Path(p.Files()[0].Filename, p.Files()[0].Checksums)
list, err := p.DownloadList(packagePool)
c.Check(err, IsNil)
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ func (s *PackageSuite) TestVerifyFiles(c *C) {
p := NewPackageFromControlFile(s.stanza)
packagePool := files.NewPackagePool(c.MkDir())
poolPath, _ := packagePool.Path(p.Files()[0].Filename, p.Files()[0].Checksums.MD5)
poolPath, _ := packagePool.Path(p.Files()[0].Filename, p.Files()[0].Checksums)
err := os.MkdirAll(filepath.Dir(poolPath), 0755)
c.Assert(err, IsNil)