vincent/aptly
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/aptly-dev/aptly.git synced 2026-07-27 13:57:46 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Refactoring: use checksums instead of MD5 for pool/published

Browse Source 
This is related to #506

As a first step, don't pass MD5 explicitly, pass checksum info object,
so that as a next step we can choose which hash to use.

There should be no functional changes so far.

Next step: stop returning explicit paths from public package pool.
This commit is contained in:
Andrey Smirnov
2017-04-01 00:09:34 +03:00
parent 675d35c7a1
commit 50cf2b49bd
16 changed files with 77 additions and 53 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
deb/publish_test.go
+1 -1
View File
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ func (s *PublishedRepoSuite) SetUpTest(c *C) {
s.repo5, _ = NewPublishedRepo("files:other", "ppa", "maverick", []string{"source"}, []string{"main"}, []interface{}{s.localRepo}, s.factory)
s.repo5.SkipContents = true
poolPath, _ := s.packagePool.Path(s.p1.Files()[0].Filename, s.p1.Files()[0].Checksums.MD5)
poolPath, _ := s.packagePool.Path(s.p1.Files()[0].Filename, s.p1.Files()[0].Checksums)
err := os.MkdirAll(filepath.Dir(poolPath), 0755)
f, err := os.Create(poolPath)
c.Assert(err, IsNil)