mirror of
https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky
synced 2026-05-09 05:29:32 +00:00
openssl: correct license comment
The comment here stated that openssl is dual-licensed, but that would mean that either of the two licenses could be used which is *not* the case [1]. However LICENSE = "openssl" *is* correct because in OE that maps to a generic license file which includes both licenses, which makes sense because there isn't really any such thing as OpenSSL that would be covered by the "OpenSSL license" and not the "SSLeay license". Correct the comment to avoid any confusion. [1] https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html (From OE-Core rev: 6c821ce6ecae789320b31ec55c83907d6dd78359) Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Richard Purdie
parent
8bea6f81d0
commit
88d141e9de
@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ HOMEPAGE = "http://www.openssl.org/"
|
||||
BUGTRACKER = "http://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html"
|
||||
SECTION = "libs/network"
|
||||
|
||||
# "openssl | SSLeay" dual license
|
||||
# "openssl" here actually means both OpenSSL and SSLeay licenses apply
|
||||
# (see meta/files/common-licenses/OpenSSL to which "openssl" is SPDXLICENSEMAPped)
|
||||
LICENSE = "openssl"
|
||||
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=d57d511030c9d66ef5f5966bee5a7eff"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user