1
0
mirror of https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky synced 2026-05-09 05:29:32 +00:00

openssl: correct license comment

The comment here stated that openssl is dual-licensed, but that would
mean that either of the two licenses could be used which is *not* the
case [1]. However LICENSE = "openssl" *is* correct because in OE that
maps to a generic license file which includes both licenses, which
makes sense because there isn't really any such thing as OpenSSL that
would be covered by the "OpenSSL license" and not the "SSLeay license".
Correct the comment to avoid any confusion.

[1] https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html

(From OE-Core rev: 6c821ce6ecae789320b31ec55c83907d6dd78359)

Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Paul Eggleton
2018-10-16 16:22:03 +13:00
committed by Richard Purdie
parent 8bea6f81d0
commit 88d141e9de
@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ HOMEPAGE = "http://www.openssl.org/"
BUGTRACKER = "http://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html"
SECTION = "libs/network"
# "openssl | SSLeay" dual license
# "openssl" here actually means both OpenSSL and SSLeay licenses apply
# (see meta/files/common-licenses/OpenSSL to which "openssl" is SPDXLICENSEMAPped)
LICENSE = "openssl"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=d57d511030c9d66ef5f5966bee5a7eff"