gcc-8: Upgrade to 8.2 release

(From OE-Core rev: e3f7e684cd619b5fe072179dffd573889e8ba470)

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-8.1/0041-arm-PR-target-86003-build-failures-with-with-cpu-xsc.patch

@@ -1,61 +0,0 @@
-From 11dc6b9576b78bb7a8d70491beab7ab4de24c9d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: rearnsha <rearnsha@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
-Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 08:46:04 +0000
-Subject: [PATCH] [arm] PR target/86003 build failures with --with-cpu=xscale
-
-The XScale cpu configuration in GCC has always been somewhat
-non-conforming.  Although XScale isn't an architecture (it's simply an
-implementation of ARMv5te), we do by tradition emit a specific
-pre-define for it.  We achieve this effect by adding an additional
-feature bit to the xscale CPU definition that isn't part of the base
-architecture.
-
-When I restructured the options last year I overlooked this oddity and
-the result, of course, is that this configuration now fails to build
-as intended.
-
-What happens is that the driver (correctly) constructs an architecture
-for the xscale cpu name (as armv5te) and passes it in addition to the
-CPU name.  The backend code, on finding both a cpu and an architecture
-specifies attempts to correlate the two and finds a difference due to
-the additional feature bit and reports an inconsistency (fatally if
--werror is specified).
-
-I think the best fix to this is to treat the xscale feature bit using
-the same mechanism that we use for other 'quirks' in CPU
-implementations and simply filter it out before comparing the
-capabilities.  It has the additional benefit that it's also the
-simplest fix.
-
-	PR target/86003
-	* config/arm/arm-cpus.in (ALL_QUIRKS): Add xscale feature to the list
-	of bits to ignore when comparing architectures.
-
-
-git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-8-branch@261141 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
----
-Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
-Upstream-Status: Backport
-
- gcc/ChangeLog              | 6 ++++++
- gcc/config/arm/arm-cpus.in | 4 +++-
- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm-cpus.in b/gcc/config/arm/arm-cpus.in
-index 96972a057e7..545321b0bbe 100644
---- a/gcc/config/arm/arm-cpus.in
-+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm-cpus.in
-@@ -268,7 +268,9 @@ define fgroup DOTPROD	NEON dotprod
- 
- # List of all quirk bits to strip out when comparing CPU features with
- # architectures.
--define fgroup ALL_QUIRKS   quirk_no_volatile_ce quirk_armv6kz quirk_cm3_ldrd
-+# xscale isn't really a 'quirk', but it isn't an architecture either and we
-+# need to ignore it for matching purposes.
-+define fgroup ALL_QUIRKS   quirk_no_volatile_ce quirk_armv6kz quirk_cm3_ldrd xscale
- 
- # Architecture entries
- # format:
--- 
-2.17.1
-

meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-8.2.inc

@@ -2,13 +2,13 @@ require gcc-common.inc
 
 # Third digit in PV should be incremented after a minor release
 
-PV = "8.1.0"
+PV = "8.2.0"
 
 # BINV should be incremented to a revision after a minor gcc release
 
-BINV = "8.1.0"
+BINV = "8.2.0"
 
-FILESEXTRAPATHS =. "${FILE_DIRNAME}/gcc-8.1:${FILE_DIRNAME}/gcc-8.1/backport:"
+FILESEXTRAPATHS =. "${FILE_DIRNAME}/gcc-8.2:${FILE_DIRNAME}/gcc-8.2/backport:"
 
 DEPENDS =+ "mpfr gmp libmpc zlib flex-native"
 NATIVEDEPS = "mpfr-native gmp-native libmpc-native zlib-native flex-native"
@@ -73,10 +73,9 @@ SRC_URI = "\
            ${BACKPORTS} \
 "
 BACKPORTS = "\
-           file://0041-arm-PR-target-86003-build-failures-with-with-cpu-xsc.patch \
 "
-SRC_URI[md5sum] = "65f7c65818dc540b3437605026d329fc"
-SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "1d1866f992626e61349a1ccd0b8d5253816222cdc13390dcfaa74b093aa2b153"
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = "4ab282f414676496483b3e1793d07862"
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "196c3c04ba2613f893283977e6011b2345d1cd1af9abeac58e916b1aab3e0080"
 
 S = "${TMPDIR}/work-shared/gcc-${PV}-${PR}/gcc-${PV}"
 #S = "${TMPDIR}/work-shared/gcc-${PV}-${PR}/git"