manuals: add references to the "do_patch" task

[YOCTO #14508]
Reported-by: Quentin Schulz <foss@0leil.net>
(From yocto-docs rev: 1e38ceafb25aac13bb9dd45626fd39ad1b68852d)

Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

documentation/dev-manual/common-tasks.rst

@@ -9593,7 +9593,7 @@ Running Specific Tasks
 ----------------------
 
 Any given recipe consists of a set of tasks. The standard BitBake
-behavior in most cases is: :ref:`ref-tasks-fetch`, ``do_unpack``, ``do_patch``,
+behavior in most cases is: :ref:`ref-tasks-fetch`, ``do_unpack``, :ref:`ref-tasks-patch`,
 :ref:`ref-tasks-configure`, :ref:`ref-tasks-compile`, :ref:`ref-tasks-install`, :ref:`ref-tasks-package`,
 ``do_package_write_*``, and :ref:`ref-tasks-build`. The default task is
 :ref:`ref-tasks-build` and any tasks on which it depends build first. Some tasks,

documentation/migration-guides/migration-1.3.rst

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ Previously, an inconsistent mix of spaces and tabs existed, which made
 extending these functions using ``_append`` or ``_prepend`` complicated
 given that Python treats whitespace as syntactically significant. If you
 are defining or extending any Python functions (e.g.
-``populate_packages``, ``do_unpack``, ``do_patch`` and so forth) in
+``populate_packages``, ``do_unpack``, :ref:`ref-tasks-patch` and so forth) in
 custom recipes or classes, you need to ensure you are using consistent
 four-space indentation.
 

documentation/overview-manual/concepts.rst

@@ -1208,7 +1208,7 @@ end result.
 The build system has knowledge of the relationship between these tasks
 and other preceding tasks. For example, if BitBake runs
 ``do_populate_sysroot_setscene`` for something, it does not make sense
-to run any of the :ref:`ref-tasks-fetch`, ``do_unpack``, ``do_patch``,
+to run any of the :ref:`ref-tasks-fetch`, ``do_unpack``, :ref:`ref-tasks-patch`,
 :ref:`ref-tasks-configure`, :ref:`ref-tasks-compile`, and :ref:`ref-tasks-install` tasks. However, if
 :ref:`ref-tasks-package` needs to be run, BitBake needs to run those other tasks.
 

documentation/ref-manual/qa-checks.rst

@@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ Errors and Warnings
 
 - ``Fuzz detected: <patch output> [patch-fuzz]``
 
-    This check looks for evidence of "fuzz" when applying patches within the ``do_patch``
+    This check looks for evidence of "fuzz" when applying patches within the :ref:`ref-tasks-patch`
     task. Patch fuzz is a situation when the ``patch`` tool ignores some of the context
     lines in order to apply the patch. Consider this example:
 

documentation/ref-manual/tasks.rst

@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ file as a patch file::
        "
 
 Conversely, if you have a file whose file type is ``.patch`` or ``.diff``
-and you want to exclude it so that the ``do_patch`` task does not apply
+and you want to exclude it so that the :ref:`ref-tasks-patch` task does not apply
 it during the patch phase, you can use the "apply=no" parameter with the
 :term:`SRC_URI` statement::