Extracting the source for a recipe (as used by devtool's extract, modify
and upgrade subcommands) requires us to run do_fetch, do_unpack,
do_patch and any tasks that the recipe has inserted inbetween, and do so
with a modified datastore primarily so that we can redirect WORKDIR and
STAMPS_DIR in order to have the files written out to a place of our
choosing and avoid stamping the tasks as having executed in a real build
context respectively. However, this all gets much more difficult when in
memres mode since we can't call internal functions such as
bb.build.exec_func() directly - instead we need to execute the tasks on
the server. To do this we use the buildFile command which already exists
for the purpose of supporting bitbake -b, and setVariable commands to
set up the appropriate datastore.
(I did look at passing the modified datastore to the buildFile command
instead of using setVar() on the main datastore, however its use of
databuilder makes that very difficult, and we'd also need a different
method of getting the changes in the datastore over to the worker as
well.)
(From OE-Core rev: eb63b5339014fc72ba4829714e0a96a98e135ee2)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The autotools code imports oe.package; we weren't experiencing a problem
with this probably due to OE itself adding that path previously.
(From OE-Core rev: a61d7bf8447b2d2c65eb34315c86086ff35c8bc9)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Move patch_path(), src_patches() and should_apply() to oe.patch, making
them easier to call from elsewhere (particularly across the
UI/server boundary).
(From OE-Core rev: 2724511e18810cc8082c1b028e3b7c8a8b5def56)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If PATCHTOOL is "git", and PATCH_COMMIT_FUNCTIONS is set to "1", for
additional tasks between do_unpack and do_patch, make a git commit. This
logic was previously implemented in devtool itself, but it makes more
sense for it to be implemented in the patch class since that's where the
rest of the logic is for this (or in lib/oe/patch.py). It also makes
it possible for this to work with tinfoil2.
(From OE-Core rev: f24f59ea1d8bc335ea8576f6a346d0935f4a3548)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
With the changes to the code for extracting source for a recipe, we are
properly executing the tasks for a recipe, which means their stamps (and
therefore signatures) are important. When running devtool extract on
the lsof recipe I noticed that do_fetch and do_unpack were executing a
second time when we called for do_patch, and this turned out to be
because LIC_FILES_CHKSUM in that recipe contains an entry which
is an absolute path (has ${S} at the start). Normally this wouldn't be
an issue since S is under TMPDIR and thus the existing code would ignore
it, however devtool's extraction code extracts to a temporary directory
which is not under TMPDIR; the result was the path to this file was not
being ignored and the second time around when the license file had been
extracted it was incorporated into the signature. We don't want this, so
explicitly exclude S as well as B and WORKDIR for good measure.
(From OE-Core rev: 1c99d74a862f25e23ea6465fab7ddc9ce74d6974)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Use Tinfoil.parse_recipe_file() and Tinfoil.parse_recipe() instead of
the recipeutils equivalents, and replace any local duplicate
implementations. This not only tidies up the code but also allows these
calls to work in memres mode.
(From OE-Core rev: f13b56266ee96dfab65a3a7db50e8051aa9f071a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We don't need to see the parsing/cache loading message in the
oe-selftest output, so use the newly added quiet option to disable it.
(From OE-Core rev: c023bc55ff000d1de891d1a8e2a163e94bf63de6)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We now have a function in cooker itself that can do this lookup;
additionally, the rewritten tinfoil's cooker adapter has its own
implementation that can work remotely, so if we use it then this
function can work in that scenario as well.
(From OE-Core rev: 0a6a4be99c1e4ef3c0da53d63f18ad579545d6a8)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
setup_tinfoil() already calls prepare(), we don't need to call it again
ourselves and doing so with tinfoil2 results in "ERROR: Only one copy of
bitbake should be run against a build directory". Calling prepare()
twice should probably still be allowed, so that ought to be fixed
separately, but in the mean time this code is still wrong so fix it
here.
(From OE-Core rev: 38b8a7d4aff096ea0a62f2ddf3fe2de1df591bf5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you printed a warning through bb.warn() / bbwarn or an error through
bb.error() / bberror, this was also being picked up by our log_check
mechanism that was designed to pick up warnings and errors printed by
other programs used during do_rootfs. This meant you saw not only the
warning or error itself, you saw it a second time through log_check,
which is a bit ugly. Use the just-added BB_TASK_LOGGER to access the
logger and add a handler that we can use to find out if any warning or
error we find in the logs is one we should ignore as it has already been
printed.
Fixes [YOCTO #8223].
(From OE-Core rev: fb37304d27857df3c53c0867e81fbc8899b48089)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We were calling _log_check() in the RPM-specific rootfs class as well as
in the base class; this is unnecessary and resulted in any errors/warnings
generated during the actual package installation time triggering two warnings
instead of one. Drop the call from RpmRootfs._create() to fix this.
(From OE-Core rev: 541c56d755ba0354297673e857628026ad9e4df2)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
In certain circumstances it can be useful to get access to BitBake's
logger within a task; the main example is in OpenEmbedded's image
construction code where we want to be able to check the log file for
errors and warnings, but we don't want to see any errors or warnings
that were emitted through the logger; so we need a way to exclude those.
In order to do this, pass the logger object into the task via a
BB_TASK_LOGGER variable, and add a logging handler class to bb.utils
that can be added to it in order to keep a list of warnings/errors that
have been emitted.
(Bitbake rev: f1cd6fab604f14d8686b1d783cbfe012d923ee42)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
On terminating the connection to the server, we were disabling SIGINT -
and this is executed on the UI side. I'm not sure whether the intention
here was to undo the SIGINT disabling we did in the server, and it was
just a mistake that it disabled rather than restored and it's run on the
wrong side, or whether we wanted to stop the user from breaking out of
the shutdown code - the commit message provides no clues either way.
Regardless, we do not want to permanently disable Ctrl+C here - it's
legitimate to terminate the connection to the server and then
re-establish it within the same process; at least currently, devtool
modify by virtue of using tinfoil in two separate parts of the code does
this, and the result of this disabling is that during the second tinfoil
usage we can potentially be parsing all recipes without the ability to
easily interrupt the process.
(Bitbake rev: 58c60a951229dcbd8253863fb24228d046c23f6e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you run the setVariable command to set variables then you end up
causing the basehash to not match the previously computed values, which
triggers error messages. These mismatches are expected, so add a means
of disabling them.
(Bitbake rev: 5a80c0e210f26526afbe8f266b7b1a9c03334967)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Allow the client to set variables with the setVariable command and have
those changes take effect when running tasks. This is accomplished by
collecting changes made by setVariable separately and pass these to the
worker so it can be applied on top of the datastore it creates.
(Bitbake rev: 69a3cd790da35c3898a8f50c284ad1a4677682a4)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The COW object used within VariableHistory can't be serialised itself,
but we can convert it to a dict when serializing and then back when
deserialising. This finally allows DataSmart objects to be serialized.
NOTE: "serialisation" here means pickling, not over XMLRPC or any other
transport.
(Bitbake rev: bbbb2a53d5decf3b613a92c4ff77c84bfc5d4903)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If we want to use this function/command internally, we don't want this
warning shown.
(Bitbake rev: 5cfbb60833e7b12d698c1c2970c17ccf2a4971bf)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you're expanding a value that refers to the value of a variable in
python code, we need to ensure that the datastore that gets used to get
the value of that variable is the client-side datastore and not just the
part of it that's on the server side. For example, suppose you are in
client code doing the following:
d.setVar('HELLO', 'there')
result = d.expand('${@d.getVar("HELLO", True)}')
result should be "there" but if the client part wasn't taken into
account, it would be whatever value HELLO had in the server portion of
the datastore (if any).
(Bitbake rev: cbc22a0a9aadc8606b927dbac0f1407ec2736b35)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It's not really practical for us to parse recipes on the client side, we
need to do it on the server because that's where we have the full python
environment (including any "pure" python functions defined in classes).
Thus, add some functions to tinfoil do this including a few shortcut
functions.
(Bitbake rev: 8f635815d191c9d848a92d51fdbf5e9fd3da1727)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
For the purposes of server-side parsing and expansion allowing for
client-side use of the datastore, we need a means of sending a datastore
from the client back to the server, where the datastore probably
consists of a remote (server-side) original plus some client-side
modifications. To do this we need to take care of a couple of things:
1) xmlrpc can't handle nested dicts, so if you enable memres and simply
try passing a serialised datastore then things break. Instead of
serialising the entire datastore, just take the naive option of
transferring the internal dict alone (as a list of tuples) for now.
2) Change the TinfoilDataStoreConnector object into simply the handle
(number) when transmitting; it gets substituted with the real
datastore when the server receives it.
(Bitbake rev: 784d2f1a024efe632fc9049ce5b78692d419d938)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Rewrite tinfoil as a wrapper around the UI, instead of the earlier
approach of starting up just enough of cooker to do what we want. This
has several advantages:
* It now works when bitbake is memory-resident instead of failing with
"ERROR: Only one copy of bitbake should be run against a build
directory".
* We can now connect an actual UI, thus you get things like the recipe
parsing / cache loading progress bar and parse error handling for free
* We can now handle events generated by the server if we wish to do so
* We can potentially extend this to do more stuff, e.g. actually running
build operations - this needs to be made more practical before we can
use it though (since you effectively have to become the UI yourself
for this at the moment.)
The downside is that tinfoil no longer has direct access to cooker, the
global datastore, or the cache. To mitigate this I have extended
data_smart to provide remote access capability for the datastore, and
created "fake" cooker and cooker.recipecache / cooker.collection adapter
objects in order to avoid breaking too many tinfoil-using scripts that
might be out there (we've never officially documented tinfoil or
BitBake's internal code, but we can still make accommodations where
practical). I've at least gone far enough to support all of the
utilities that use tinfoil in OE-Core with some changes, but I know
there are scripts such as Chris Larson's "bb" out there that do make
other calls into BitBake code that I'm not currently providing access to
through the adapters.
Part of the fix for [YOCTO #5470].
(Bitbake rev: 3bbf8d611c859f74d563778115677a04f5c4ab43)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
In memory resident mode we don't really want to actually shut down since
it's only the client going away.
(Bitbake rev: 74db369c46043116359101cab70486afd82372c0)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This allows you to maintain a local reference to a remote datastore. The
actual implementation of the remote connection is delegated to a
connector object that the caller must define and supply. There is
support for getting variable values and expanding python references
(i.e. ${@...} remotely, however setting variables remotely is not
supported - any variable setting is done locally as if the datastore
were a copy (which it kind of is).
Loosely based on an earlier prototype implementation by Qing He.
(Bitbake rev: a3edc3eefa2d03c4ad5d12187b32fa4dc495082a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you send back a string here you get "TypeError: 'str' does not
support the buffer interface" errors in bitbake-cookerdaemon.log and
"IncompleteRead(0 bytes read, 22 more expected)" errors on the client
side.
(Bitbake rev: 0d659a7dfe5fb096f8aa4380320f9e2a464b3cb5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If we're in observe-only mode then we cannot run commands that would
affect the server's state, including getSetVariable, so prevent that
from being called in observe-only mode.
(Bitbake rev: 2c5a8661430edebff67ab4a108995033d182b5d6)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Allow you to specify -q / --quiet more than once to reduce the messages
even further. It will now operate as follows:
Level Option Result
----- ------ ----------------------------------------
0 Print usual output
1 -q Only show progress and warnings or above
2 -qq Only show warnings or above
3+ -qqq Only show errors
(Bitbake rev: 6cf2582e17c28ca04f5cfb59858c4a9778c700d4)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
There is no "datasmart" member, only dataroot. This dates back to the
original implementation of variable history support - it's surprising we
haven't noticed the issue until now, but I guess it's rare to change a
copy of a datastore in a manner which using the old reference would
cause an issue.
(Bitbake rev: febd5534b07edfdef15cedb0578730c582c7373f)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Yet another instance of us expecting a string back from subprocess when
in Python 3 what you get back is bytes. Just decode the output within
run_command() so we avoid this everywhere.
(From OE-Core rev: 103faae78cdff5280c7b7cdb7ca01e0868d02ec9)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The hello-mod recipe is unusual in that it has only local files in
SRC_URI and builds these out of ${WORKDIR}. When you use devtool modify
on it, devtool puts all of those files in an "oe-local-files"
subdirectory of the source tree, which is not ${S} (or ${B}) any more
and thus building the recipe afterwards fails. It's a bit of a hack, but
symlink the files in oe-local-files into the source tree (and commit the
symlinks with an ignored commit so that the repo is clean) to work
around the problem. We only do this at time of extraction, so any files
added to or removed from oe-local-files after that won't be handled, but
I think there's a limit to how far we should go to support these kinds
of recipes - ultimately they are anomalies.
I initially tried a hacky workaround where I set effectively set B =
"${WORKDIR}" and that allowed it to build, but other things such as the
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM checks still broke because they expected to find files
in ${S}. Another hack where I set the sourcetree to point to the
oe-local-files subdirectory works for hello-mod but not for makedevs
since whilst that is similar, unlike hello-mod it does in fact have
files in the source tree (since it has a patch that adds COPYING) and
thus the same issue occurred.
Also tweak one of the tests that tries devtool modify / update-recipe on
the makedevs recipe to try building it since that would have caught this
issue.
Fixes [YOCTO #10616].
(From OE-Core rev: 857c06d6a1d161bf5a01311d07758bd4241929a3)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you have a file:// entry in SRC_URI with a subdir= parameter that
makes it extract into the source tree, then when you update that file in
oe-local-files and run devtool update-recipe then you want the original
file to be updated. This was made to work by OE-Core commit
9069fef5dad5a873c8a8f720f7bcbc7625556309 together with
31f1bbad248c36a8c86dde4ff57ce42efc664082, however until now there was no
oe-selftest test to verify it.
Note that in order to succeed this test also requires the fix
"lib/oe/recipeutils: ignore archives by default in
get_recipe_local_files()" since the test recipe uses a local tarball.
(From OE-Core rev: 936eba3e1059d1dcd5e58c1ce76870fff7b11b3c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
By default, have get_recipe_local_files() not return any archive
files. This prevents a local tarball from being erroneously removed
from SRC_URI if you run "devtool modify" on a recipe followed by
"devtool update-recipe". It doesn't actually help you to directly
update the contents of such tarballs, but at least now it won't break
the recipe.
(From OE-Core rev: e9c418d4704c1bed4c5880e176e5288485f4f5a6)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you have a patch remotely fetched in a recipe (e.g. from an http
server) that needs updating then add a local version and substitute the
entry in SRC_URI to point to it.
One can argue about how desirable it is to be modifying patches fetched
in this way, but then one can argue about how desirable it is to have
such patches in the recipe in the first place - and in any case if
devtool update-recipe is to correctly transfer changes to such patches
made in the git repository within the source tree to the recipe then
there isn't much choice but to do it this way.
(From OE-Core rev: a19c26cc78a181f9dd2706dd42e7e450d7ad4082)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It is possible to use gzip or bzip2 to compress patches and still refer
to them in compressed form in the SRC_URI value within a recipe. If you
run "devtool modify" on such a recipe, make changes to the commit for
the patch and then run devtool update-recipe, we need to correctly
associate the commit back to the compressed patch file and re-compress
the patch, neither of which we were doing previously.
Additionally, add an oe-selftest test to ensure this doesn't regress in
future.
Fixes [YOCTO #8278].
(From OE-Core rev: e47d21624dfec6f71742b837e91da553f18a28c5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If a patch applied by a recipe has no header and we turn the recipe's
source into a git tree (when PATCHTOOL = "git" or when using devtool
extract / modify / upgrade), the commit message ends up consisting only
of the original filename marker ("%% original patch: filename.patch").
When we come to do turn the commits back into a set of patches in
extractPatches(), this first line ends up in the "Subject: " part of
the file, but we were ignoring it because the line didn't start with the
marker text. The end result was we weren't able to get the original
patch name. Strip off any "Subject [PATCH x/y]" part before looking for
the marker text to fix.
This caused "devtool modify openssl" followed by "devtool update-recipe
openssl" (without any changes in-between) to remove version-script.patch
because that patch has no header and we weren't able to determine the
original filename.
(From OE-Core rev: d9971f5dc8eb7de551fd6f5e058fd24770ef5d78)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add a test to ensure devtool update-recipe works properly on recipes
that contain only local files (since the other tests we have didn't test
that).
Relates to [YOCTO #10563].
(From OE-Core rev: bdc844b3f0c3fbddcd3523095899a5bd29797704)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
As of the move to Python 3 and the fixes we applied at that time,
bb.process.run() will return a byte array of length 0 rather than an
empty string if the output is empty. That may be a bug that we should
fix, but for now it's easiest to just check the result here before
treating it as a string. This fixes running "devtool update-recipe" or
"devtool finish" on a recipe which has no source tree, for example
initramfs-framework.
Fixes [YOCTO #10563].
(From OE-Core rev: 66bf6978fc807ecc422fb6b6328f68bc3406cf15)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If ud.ignore_checksums is set (which we currently use to suppress the
warnings for missing SRC_URI checksums when fetching files from
scripts), then if we're fetching an npm package we should similarly
suppress the warnings when NPM_LOCKDOWN and NPM_SHRINKWRAP aren't set.
At the same time, make any errors reading either of these files actual
errors since if the file is specified and could not be found, that
should be an error - not the exact same warning.
Fixes [YOCTO #10464].
(Bitbake rev: cefb8c93c8299e68352cf7ec5ad9ca50c0d499ed)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When you run devtool add on a source tree we attempt to figure out the
correct name and version for the recipe. However, despite our best
efforts, sometimes the name and/or version we come up with isn't
correct, and the only way to remedy that up until now was to reset the
recipe, delete the source tree and start again, specifying the name this
time. To avoid this slightly painful procedure, add a "rename"
subcommand that lets you rename the recipe and/or change the version.
(From OE-Core rev: 9303d8055c45a0f6af295d70a6f6a8b9d8d8a7c9)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If a variable is being set in the recipe when we've explicitly passed
None as the value to _test_recipe_contents() indicating that it
shouldn't be set at all, then we should be printing out the variable
name in the assertion message but it seems like I forgot to do a
substitution. Also include the value for informational purposes.
(From OE-Core rev: 0dafcb158003fb13f82c266f607d9967fca321db)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
recipetool sets the LICENSE value based on licenses detected from the
source tree. If there are multiple licenses then they were being
separated by spaces, but this isn't actually legal formatting and if
you're using "devtool add" you get a warning printed when devtool
parses the recipe internally.
Earlier I had made a conscious decision to do it this way since it's up
to the user to figure out whether the multiple licenses should all apply
(in which case they'd be separated with &) or if there is a choice of
license (in which case | is the correct separator). However, I've come
to the conclusion that we can just default to & and then the ugly
warning goes away, and it's the safest alternative of the two (and most
likely to be correct, since it's more common to have a codebase which is
made up of code with different licenses, i.e. all of them apply to the
combined work).
I've tweaked the comment that we add to the recipe to explicitly state
that we've used & and that the user needs to change that if that's not
accurate.
Fixes [YOCTO #10413].
(From OE-Core rev: ecac6aee8cf3313350b58c21012bcd67cfb915e4)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you run devtool finish to move a recipe created in the workspace by
devtool add or devtool upgrade to a layer, and that layer is not
currently included in bblayers.conf (perhaps unintentionally), then the
recipe will no longer be visible to bitbake. In this scenario, show a
warning so that the user isn't surprised by the recipe "going missing".
(From OE-Core rev: 4da8a58e2997db4f24ae0cac0ba27259d7857a05)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If devtool finish is run on a recipe where the recipe file itself is in
the workspace (e.g. where devtool add / devtool upgrade has been used)
and the specified destination layer is not in bblayers.conf, then we
need to avoid running bitbake -c clean at the end because the recipe has
been moved, but the bbappend is still present in the workspace layer at
that point and so if we do it will fail due to the dangling bbappend.
It's difficult to do the clean at the point we'd want to because tinfoil
is holding bitbake.lock for most of the time, but in any case cleaning
the recipe is less important than it used to be since we started
managing the sysroot contents more strictly, so just disable cleaning
under these circumstances to avoid the problem.
Fixes [YOCTO #10484].
(From OE-Core rev: c6980307d43632f4172e79d9607004203af4e9c8)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When running devtool add, instead of hiding the recipetool create
output, change it so that it's appropriate to show in the devtool
context and show it in real-time. This means that you get status output
such as when a URL is being fetched (though currently no progress
information.) recipetool create now has a hidden --devtool option to
enable this display mode.
(From OE-Core rev: 219aec8803de4ef04c514c87ecfb15359c9424a6)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you use devtool update-recipe with the --append option, and a "local"
(in oe-local-files) has been modified we copy it into the specified
destination layer. With the way the devtool update-recipe code works now
the source is always a temp directory, and printing paths from within
that is just confusing, so if the path starts with the temp directory
then just print the file name alone.
(From OE-Core rev: 61475f0267d40c618ebf36023d0b6414a25975cb)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It seems that possibly due to OE-Core commit
ac59063bee0e32d0737340974f657341717a6abe, binaries produced without
uninative aren't compatible with the uninative glibc. I did try earlier
to ensure that the eSDK could work without uninative since the default
configuration in OE-Core does not enable it, but it seems like I didn't
go far enough. Given the practical considerations, just give up and
require uninative to be enabled in order to build the eSDK. I'm not
particularly happy about this, but I don't seem much of an alternative.
Fixes [YOCTO #10566].
(From OE-Core rev: b59eee7bebd413c7abe5626f69508e1fe47dd0ac)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you are using a repository which contains a .templateconf file that
sets TEMPLATECONF to point into a layer it contains, but you aren't
using that layer in your bblayers.conf, the eSDK would produce an error
during the preparation step of the installation. An example would be
using the poky repository but setting DISTRO to your own custom distro
and removing meta-poky from your bblayers.conf. The eSDK doesn't
support creating new build directories, so we don't care about the
templates and can thus force a known good value to prevent this from
happening.
Fixes [YOCTO #10568].
(From OE-Core rev: 5ee32191a18013061dfa72e64713a94c5d321496)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This directory shouldn't contain local.conf and bblayers.conf - just
templates for them; except it doesn't have to contain those, it just has
to exist to pass this test. Change the error message accordingly, and
mention TEMPLATECONF so that the user has at least some context.
(From OE-Core rev: 61adaaa4348c670769f8750223977dbefe369ffb)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
SDK_OLDEST_KERNEL currently only controls the check on SDK installation,
however as with OLDEST_KERNEL it should be controlling the OLDEST_KERNEL
value for building glibc used in the SDK. Thus, set it in
nativesdk.bbclass. This means we need to move the default to
bitbake.conf so that it can be seen in both places.
Also set a more reasonable default for SDK_OLDEST_KERNEL for x86/x86-64 as
glibc 2.24 still supports back to 2.6.32 there and there are still
people wanting to build SDKs that will install on older distros (e.g.
CentOS 6). However it's not possible to set this with overrides since
there aren't any for the SDK_ARCH, however we can instead set the variable
from conf files in conf/machine-sdk especially as there is now a soft
default for SDKMACHINE.
Fixes [YOCTO #10561].
(From OE-Core rev: 42d5781e31c5bf76b5b7e27abed4f6f3fd65bf40)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you used an & character in SDK_TITLE (possibly indirectly from
DISTRO_NAME) then sed interpreted this as a directive to paste in the
replaced string (@SDK_TITLE@ in this case). Escape any & characters in
SDK_TITLE to avoid that.
(From OE-Core rev: acb85689c13cfdac21435509001048af5c3a7e99)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Using "npm install" instead of "cp -a" is the more correct thing to be
doing here, and ensures that symlinks for executable scripts are put
into ${prefix}/bin. (I'd prefer ${bindir}, but npm does not allow
specifying paths at that level - only a prefix.)
Fixes [YOCTO #10460].
(From OE-Core rev: 90cb980a1c49de99a0aec00c0cd5fc1e165490a7)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you set LIC_FILES_CHKSUM to point to a relative symlink then you'll
get "Could not copy license file" warnings in copy_license_files() since
the symlink won't be valid after it's copied. If the source is a symlink
then we need to dereference it first.
I encountered this when I used recipetool on the sources for capnproto,
where the c++ directory contains a LICENSE.txt symlink to the LICENSE
file in the parent directory, and this symlink ends up being pointed to
in LIC_FILES_CHKSUM.
(From OE-Core rev: c4d3b1e9c37b920444e53d3231552da18d101882)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The new runqemu script assumes that if OECORE_NATIVE_SYSROOT is set then
it shouldn't try to run bitbake to find out the values of various
variables such as DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE; this assumption is incorrect for the
extensible SDK. To work around this, clear OECORE_NATIVE_SYSROOT in the
environment when running runqemu.
Fixes [YOCTO #10447].
(From OE-Core rev: abff69a48bf3076ce8e21356accdc8d85d2c8dbf)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the user modifies files such as CMakeLists.txt in the case of cmake,
we want do_configure to re-run so that those changes can take effect. In
order to accomplish that, have a variable CONFIGURE_FILES which
specifies a list of files that will be put into do_configure's checksum
(either full paths, or just filenames which will be searched for in the
entire source tree). CONFIGURE_FILES then just needs to be set
appropriately depending on what do_configure is doing; for now I've set
this for autotools and cmake which are the most common cases.
Fixes [YOCTO #7617].
(From OE-Core rev: 923fc20c2862a6d75f949082c9f6532ab7e2d2cd)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The Yocto Project Eclipse plugin requires that runqemu and unfsd are
accessible within the SDK, and indeed the standard SDK has these. This
turns out to be fairly easy to do - we just need to add unfsd and symlink
it, runqemu and a few other scripts into the SDK's bin directory.
Fixes [YOCTO #10214].
(From OE-Core rev: 9007e0e3fce7e09b043fead54b17f69c1661d162)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the user runs devtool add on an npm:// URL (or source tree that uses
node.js), and npm is not available, just build nodejs-native instead of
telling the user they need to do it; if that fails because there isn't
any such recipe (which would be the default, since it's not in OE-Core)
then produce a slightly more readable error message hinting at what the
user needs to do.
Note that this forces the use of nodejs-native rather than npm on the
host - this makes sense for two reasons: (1) we need it to be compatible
with nodejs for the target, and (2) we have to have a recipe for that
anyway, so allowing you to avoid having a recipe for the native version
isn't really beneficial.
There's a bit of a hack in here in order to allow this - for node.js
sources that aren't fetched via npm we don't know that they are that
until we've fetched and unpacked them, by which time we're inside
recipetool and have an active tinfoil instance that will prevent bitbake
being run. To avoid this being an issue, we allow recipetool to get to
the point where we know we need npm and then exit with a specific exit
code, at which point devtool can try to build it and then if that
succeeds, it will re-execute recipetool. This is definitely not ideal,
but it can't really be refactored and done properly until we do the
tinfoil2 refactoring; in the mean time though we still want to be
helpful to the user.
Fixes [YOCTO #10337].
(From OE-Core rev: f40662bde5aab158c4e4c3c3ff5e68665a4194a5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We want to remove the -f/--fetch option at some point (as you can now
specify a URL as a positional argument instead) so display a warning
that it's deprecated if it is used.
(From OE-Core rev: 43476d77a91d50454ca26e016a3413b24e9f3aec)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We were supposed to be printing out the specified recipe name here but I
forgot to specify a parameter for the string.
(From OE-Core rev: 87f844e533adfc229a5d26857a82cc6b125216c8)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When PATCHTOOL = "git", if we need to manually apply a patch and then
commit it (i.e. when git am doesn't work) we try to extract the author /
date / shortlog from the patch header. Make the following improvements
to that extraction process:
* If there's no explicit Subject: but the first line is followed by a
blank line, isn't an Upstream-Status: or Index: marker and isn't too
long, then assume it's good enough to be the shortlog. This avoids
having too many patches with "Upgrade to version x.y" as the shortlog
(since that is often when patches get added).
* Add --follow to the command we use to find the commit that added the
patch, so we mostly get the commit that added the patch rather than
getting stuck on upgrade commits that last moved/renamed the patch
* Populate the date from the commit that added the patch if we were able
to get the author but not the date from the patch (otherwise you get
today's date which is less useful).
(From OE-Core rev: 896cfb10ec166a677cbb3b4f8643719cabeb7663)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you leave "From <hash>" lines in the commit message it can actually
break git rebase because it tries to interpret the line in the context
of the current repository, and if the hash is invalid then a rebase
will blow up with:
fatal: git cat-file: could not get object info
or in newer git versions:
error: unable to find <hash>
fatal: git cat-file <hash>: bad file
(I hit this when I tried to do a devtool upgrade on openssl to 1.0.2i
the first time I did "git rebase --skip")
(From OE-Core rev: 19a6b18ac23cb2d7bb89203f774b2bee7f0cb03c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
These tools are relics of an earlier time when the Zaurus devices were
reference platforms - these days they are no longer needed. It seems
amazing that they survived earlier purges.
(From OE-Core rev: 49919585e5cec2999201fce8cb1b70f1cf7f591e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When calculating how many lines we'd printed we weren't properly taking
the progress bars into account, with the result that sometimes if the
last line printed on the terminal wrapped to the next line (which is
possible) we backed up less lines than we should have.
Additionally, we should always print a newline after updating the
progress bar - there's no need to check if there wasn't output (there
always will be courtesy of our overridden _need_update()) and we now
allow the line to wrap so we don't need to check the other condition
either.
Hopefully this will fix [YOCTO #10046].
(Bitbake rev: 326d18d96faf02675ba34ad3c3a20cd424b39b91)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Now that recipeutils.validate_pn() properly validates characters used in
the name, we can drop this bit checking for '/' since that's not
permitted by validate_pn(). (The FIXME comment here - that I myself
apparently wrote - is questionable since that function was clearly never
intended to allow '/', perhaps I was misled because it was broken and
did so).
(From OE-Core rev: e010d9be3709cf3c607ffc03c3188abe4e1e9eb4)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* validate_pn() is supposed to protect against invalid characters, fix
the function so that it actually does (unanchored regex strikes
again...)
* However, now that the function is enforcing the restrictions, we do
still want to allow + in recipe names (e.g. "gtk+")
(From OE-Core rev: c5d5a1baf98a11676537fb5e9f8ec4409e30c1fd)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
In keeping with making recipetool create / devtool add as easy to use as
possible, users shouldn't have to know how to reformat git short form ssh
URLs for consumption by BitBake's fetcher (for example
user@git.example.com:repo.git should be expressed as
git://user@git.example.com/repo.git;protocol=ssh ) - instead we should
just take care of that automatically. Add some logic in the appropriate
places to do that.
(From OE-Core rev: 78c672a72f49c4b6cfd8c247efcc676b0ba1681a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Filter out a plain "Licensed under the XXXX license" statement, as seen
in the capnproto project (and no doubt others).
(From OE-Core rev: ba4aa319fd49ee02ce2e30c2db0f3988c0e8833c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
AX_PKG_SWIG is not the only commonly-used macro for detecting swig -
there's also AC_PROG_SWIG. As per AX_PKG_SWIG, add swig-native to
DEPENDS if AC_PROG_SWIG is found in configure.ac.
(From OE-Core rev: 847a1aa7153fc8a7b820353283a6f1e51d64f8de)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If python is required then we need to inherit pythonnative (or
python3native) otherwise do_configure will probably fail since it won't
be able to find python.
(From OE-Core rev: 63234cc45aee91b031657971f36997e1443f80ee)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When creating a recipe for an existing local git clone, we attempt to
use the fetcher to determine if it supports the SRCREV variable.
Unfortunately running this code does a network check to get the latest
revision as a direct result of us using '${AUTOREV}' as a default value.
If you don't have a network connection this will of course fail. Rather
than have this block creating the recipe, catch the exception and just
guess from the URL.
Ultimately this should probably be fixed in the fetcher but for now this
will at least resolve the issue on this end.
(From OE-Core rev: f7e43f931d7d6019a3b2509b2b2635978fbbae36)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
I ran into an example where recipetool was getting the name/version
completely wrong:
https://bitbucket.org/sortsmill/libunicodenames/downloads/libunicodenames-1.1.0_beta1.tar.xz
>From this it would create a libunicodenames-1.1.0-beta1_1.1.0-beta1.bb
file (likely because it couldn't split the file name and therefore took
all of it, then got the version from one of the files inside the
tarball). When this happens it's just irritating because you then have
to delete the recipe / run devtool reset and then run recipetool create
/ devtool add again and specify the version manually.
This patch is the result of systematically running the
determine_from_filename() function over the files on the Yocto Project
source mirror and my local downloads directory and fixing as many of the
generic issues as reasonably practical - it now gets the name and
version correct much more often. There are still cases where it won't,
but they are now in the minority.
(From OE-Core rev: 7b018b1d493a8d10fd02b8cc220990b191c87fe5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Try to ensure that for Apache, GPL and LGPL where the values extracted
from the "Classifiers" field may not be version-specific, if there is a
versioned license in the free-form license field then use that instead.
Also insert the free-form license field as a comment in the recipe for
the user's reference.
(From OE-Core rev: 237f66042eedd906f654827b53bf9269738267ab)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Make use of the extravalues dict to send back other variable values from
the python handling plugin, and enable passing back PV and PN. This not
only places variable values in the final recipe a bit more consistently
with other types of source, it also allows the name and version to be
picked up fron a local source tree and not just when the recipe is
fetched from a remote URL that happens to have those in it.
(From OE-Core rev: 3e7029f28c6ea9bb1d283bcdc3fdfee11455af8e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The "forever" package, despite its innocent description, actually drags
in a surprising number of dependencies and as a result the nodejs test
takes up to 10 minutes as a result. Pick a different example with a much
more reasonable set of dependencies.
Addresses part of [YOCTO #10254].
(From OE-Core rev: 638ee71da967f093071ba25e0ea5c467dab65339)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If we've already fetched a particular URL then we do not need to do so
again within in the same operation. Maintain an internal list of fetched
URLs to avoid doing that.
(Bitbake rev: b4705c80add1f618c11a9223cdd9578d763b50ec)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Indirect paths (e.g. ${TOPDIR}/../meta-something) do generally work if
used in BBLAYERS in bblayers.conf. However, if you built an extensible
SDK with this configuration then the creation of the workspace within
the SDK using devtool in do_populate_sdk_ext failed. This is because
the copy_buildsystem code was no longer correctly recognising that the
core layer ("meta") was part of a repository (e.g. openembedded-core /
poky) that should be shipped together - because of the indirection - and
thus it was splitting out the meta directory, and a number of places in
the code assume that the meta directory is next to the scripts
directory. Use os.path.abspath() to flatten out any indirections.
(From OE-Core rev: 7c0788cd2390fd0e1ec84bc9dbebcb67daee429f)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
After we run the build system within the eSDK internally as part of the
sstate filtering that happens during do_populate_sdk_ext, we need to
ensure that the TMPDIR created during that process gets deleted. However
we were using the TMPDIR path for the build producing the eSDK which may
not be the same (since that value would typically be filtered out) thus
if the user had set TMPDIR to something other than the default, the
temporary TMPDIR would not be deleted which not only led to extraneous
junk entering the SDK but also failures during install because the
TMPDIR path was different. In order to fix this, force TMPDIR to a known
value during the sstate filtering run so we know what to delete
afterwards.
Fixes [YOCTO #10210].
(From OE-Core rev: 038d9db66e69c9de12eb8581acb28a8facd726b6)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If we output extra blank lines (because of some automated editing) then
it makes the output recipe look a bit untidy. You could argue that we
should simply have the editing code not do that, but sometimes we don't
have enough context there for that to be practical. It's simple enough
to just filter out the extra blank lines when writing the file, so just
do it that way.
(From OE-Core rev: cbebc9a2edf7d7a422ee5c71219e79e3b349de3b)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you have your own node.js application you may not publish it (or at
least not immediately) in an npm registry - it might just be in a
repository on github or on your local machine. Add support to recipetool
create for creating recipes to build such applications - extract their
dependencies, fetch them, and add corresponding npm:// URLs to SRC_URI,
and ensure that LICENSE / LIC_FILES_CHKSUM are updated to match. For
example, you can now run:
recipetool create https://github.com/diversario/node-ssdp
(I had to borrow some code from bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/npm.py to
implement this functionality; this should be refactored out but now
isn't the time to do that refactoring.)
Part of the fix for [YOCTO #9537].
(From OE-Core rev: 4fb8b399c05a1b66986fc76e13525f6c5e0d9b58)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you make adjustments to the source tree (as create_npm.py will be)
then you will need to re-run the license variable handling code at the
end so that we get all of the files that should go into
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM if nothing else. Split out the license variable
handling to a separate function in order to allow this.
(From OE-Core rev: f0d6f4b7e87ea781ac0dffcc8d0310570975811b)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
For debugging it's useful to be able to tell recipetool to keep the
temporary directory.
(From OE-Core rev: 480a6b745a85b2881e5cc1a0bbb572e3235ca008)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Ensure we fetch submodules and set SRC_URI correctly when pointing to a
git repository that contains submodules.
(From OE-Core rev: 65d5cc62d4ecfc78ce4b37b3886a7fe5aa05a75e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When trying to map python module dependencies to the packages that
provide them, if we're looking for .so files that satisfy
dependencies then we need to exclude files found under the .debug
directory, otherwise the dependency will get mapped to the python-dbg
package which isn't correct.
For example, this fixes creating a recipe for pyserial and not getting
python-fcntl in RDEPENDS_${PN}, leading to errors when trying to use the
serial module on the target.
(From OE-Core rev: 46a068ca35975988a8e9c0310f71fdcee55937a4)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If AX_PKG_SWIG is found in configure.ac, then what's being looked for is
the swig binary, not swig for the target - so fix the dependency
accordingly.
(From OE-Core rev: 2600cd6f6c63ecf79804e2bc6eb6f198a012d5d6)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It's rare but there are recipes that have individual files (as opposed
to archives) in SRC_URI using subdir= to put them under the source tree,
the examples in OE-Core being bzip2 and openssl. This broke devtool
update-recipe (and devtool finish) because the file wasn't unpacked into
the oe-local-files directory and thus when it came time to update the
recipe, the file was assumed to have been deleted by the user and thus
the file was erroneously removed. Add logic to handle these properly so
that this doesn't happen.
(We still have another potential problem in that these files become part
of the initial commit from upstream, which could be confusing because
they didn't come from there - but that's a separate issue and not one
that is trivially solved.)
(From OE-Core rev: 9069fef5dad5a873c8a8f720f7bcbc7625556309)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When extracting patches from a git repository with PATCHTOOL = "git" we
cannot assume that all patches will be UTF-8 formatted, so as with other
places in this module, try latin-1 if utf-8 fails.
This fixes UnicodeDecodeError running devtool update-recipe or devtool
finish on the openssl recipe.
(From OE-Core rev: 579e4d54a212d04cfece2c9fc0635d7ac1644058)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
No functional changes, just make a couple of minor tweaks to the
comments for edit_metadata():
* There are four elements to be returned by the callback function
* Add an example return statement for when you don't want to modify the
value
(Bitbake rev: 99675c19375c96140bc8ae8f9fc3a1945a77cebb)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The correct name of the parameter is "version" not "ver" so ensure we
aren't misleading the user by giving the latter in an example.
(Bitbake rev: 14c045c6a20993d389b91ae2459d811a1430a7b2)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Allow using a top-level shrinkwrap file with one or more npm://
dependencies, i.e. if the module isn't found at the top level then look
one level down.
Part of the fix for [YOCTO #9537].
(Bitbake rev: f7de3f8b5f628dee043fe783148812914ab20813)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
"npmpkg" can be a default, but it should respect the subdir parameter as
with other FetchMethods. This allows us to have more than one npm://
entry in SRC_URI without nasty hacks.
Fix required in order to support [YOCTO #9537].
(Bitbake rev: e6a94d2091ec5d42f25102334a8492a731b8dec3)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
You cannot set a URL-specific value in an object-level variable on
the FetchMethod in urldata_init() or the result is the value specific to
the last URL will be the one that gets set. This prevented fetching more
than one npm:// URL correctly - the other tarballs would not download to
the correct location and do_unpack failed to find them as a result.
Fix required in order to support [YOCTO #9537].
(Bitbake rev: 1435b49ea7d0f9d4cc4a665fb2aa83d1eea7900f)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We were downloading into the current directory here, which is fine if
that current directory can be expected to be the right place - but
that's not true when called from recipetool within OE. We should
explicitly specify the directory to run the command in and then there
won't be a problem.
(Bitbake rev: 0ddaf725e5a0675b252b7f80b1706370e478175b)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We should always shut down tinfoil when we're finished with it, either
by explicitly calling the shutdown() method or by using it as a
context manager ("with ...").
(From OE-Core rev: 5ec6d9ef309b841cdcbf1d14ac678d106d5d888a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The multiconfig changes altered some of the functions being called here,
so update the calls. Make use of the new Tinfoil.parse_recipe_file()
function to make parsing easier.
(From OE-Core rev: 95b6ceffd947271f315d8a7660797ab371adfbb9)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When using PATCHTOOL = "git", the user of the system is not really the
committer - it's the build system itself. Thus, specify "dummy" values
for username and email instead of using the user's configured values.
Various parts of the devtool code that need to make commits have also
been updated to use the same logic.
This allows PATCHTOOL = "git" and devtool to be used on systems where
git user.name / user.email has not been set (on versions of git where
it doesn't default a value under this circumstance).
If you want to return to the old behaviour where the externally
configured user name / email are used, set the following in your
local.conf:
PATCH_GIT_USER_NAME = ""
PATCH_GIT_USER_EMAIL = ""
Fixes [YOCTO #8703].
(From OE-Core rev: 765a9017eaf77ea3204fb10afb8181629680bd82)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
OE-Core commit d3057cba0b01484712fcee3c52373c143608a436 fixed handling
of wildcard bbappends, which means that this test's expectations about
the bbappend file name are no longer met. devtool finish is meant to use
wildcard bbappends so fix the test accordingly.
(From OE-Core rev: 21603566e4a2e709dcb4a940b49d870c91c822be)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Parsing a recipe is such a common task for tinfoil-using scripts, and is
a little awkward to do properly, so add an API function to do it. This
should also isolate scripts a little from future changes to the internal
code. The first user of this will be the OpenEmbedded layer index update
script.
Part of the fix for [YOCTO #10192].
(Bitbake rev: 39780b1ccbd76579db0fc6fb9369c848a3bafa9d)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To accommodate the OpenEmbedded layer index recipe parsing, we have to
have the ability to pass in a custom config datastore since it
constructs a synthetic one. To make this possible after the multi-config
changes, rename the internal _load_bbfile() function to parse_recipe(),
make it a function at the module level (since it doesn't actually need
to access any members of the class or instance) and move setting
__BBMULTICONFIG inside it since other code will expect that to be set.
Part of the fix for [YOCTO #10192].
(Bitbake rev: 5b3fedfe0822dd7effa4b6d5e96eaf42669a71df)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We should always shut down tinfoil when we're finished with it, either
by explicitly calling the shutdown() method or by using it as a
context manager ("with ...").
(Bitbake rev: 131e6dc4bbd197774d35d2b266bfb0816f6e6b1e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Since calling the shutdown() function is highly recommended, make
tinfoil objects a little easier to deal with by adding context manager
support - so you can do the following:
with bb.tinfoil.Tinfoil() as tinfoil:
tinfoil.prepare(True)
...
(Bitbake rev: f59bc6be2b4af1acdcf6a1b184956b5ffd297743)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you don't do this, with Python 3 you get a warning on exit under some
circumstances.
(Bitbake rev: 49502685df3e616023df352823156381b1f79cd3)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Paul Eggleton