* We now match on more than just target recipes, so don't specify that
only target recipes are searched.
* We're printing the SUMMARY value in addition to the name, so mention
that so it's clear where that text is coming from.
* Remind users that they should use quotes around the keyword to avoid
shell expansion when using regular expressions.
(From OE-Core rev: cc68971557fe065e59ff47657f650051eb85db3c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If pkgdata isn't present or is incomplete, then you get either a
traceback or you don't see the results you were hoping for. The recipe
cache that bitbake collects during startup contains some useful
information for each recipe that we could search through as well, and
we can access it easily using tinfoil's all_recipes() API function,
so add some code that does that. (We still show a warning if pkgdata
isn't present, as there are certain dynamic packages that are generated
at packaging time that won't show up in the cache).
One side-effect of this is that we will start showing non-target
recipes - that's actually a good thing, since seeing those is useful,
however we exclude nativesdk recipes when in the eSDK to avoid confusion
since nativesdk isn't directly applicable there.
Fixes [YOCTO #12356].
(From OE-Core rev: b8406383886d09a80a9a002150dcf364fa9902d7)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Prompted by bitbake commit 2ba8a6b25ccc12e7b543e8450121e5311c7a701d,
add .txz to the list of archives used within get_recipe_local_files()
here as well.
(From OE-Core rev: 28466586f4777f11f0a29ed5ebe9734a4e15920e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the user doesn't specify a port then we should avoid specifying one
on the ssh/scp command line in case the user has configured one for the
host they are connecting to, which was being overridden unnecessarily.
Fixes [YOCTO #12381].
(From OE-Core rev: f1020eef09fada7ef2231d5528576553f3f6bfe1)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
After OE-Core rev 5e3fe00a0233d563781849a44f53885b4e924a9c we call
os.path.abspath() on the original layer path, but we later compare that
to the destination layer path. If that layer path isn't absolute but is
effectively the same path, it should be writing to the original recipe
but because we weren't making it absolute we were writing a bbappend
instead. Call os.path.abspath() on the destination path as well to avoid
that.
(From OE-Core rev: a85a78dcf226d160e9b504bfa67b306a9175ac29)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the .devtool_md5 file doesn't contain a reference to the bbappend
file (e.g. because devtool was interrupted before it could write that
out) then _check_preserve() won't delete it, so we need to delete it
separately because otherwise the recipe won't actually be reset.
(From OE-Core rev: 751d27600a3df18d96baaa48696acf33ee964bec)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix two aspects of handling BBCLASSEXTENDed targets (e.g.
openssl-native) that have been run through "devtool upgrade":
* Fix recipe name not showing up in "devtool status"
* Fix "devtool reset" not deleting empty directories under the recipe
directory within the workspace, which may lead to problems if you
subsequently run "devtool upgrade" on the same target again
(From OE-Core rev: 56e04260d64de9c5b83893d97cf41b7ea9a45878)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
In a few places we have checks to see path B is the parent of path A, by
adding / to the end of the path B and then seeing if path A starts with
the suffixed path B. Unfortunately there are two potential flaws:
(1) path A needs to be suffixed with / as well or the directory itself
won't match (semantics perhaps, but in a lot of scenarios returning True
is correct); (2) you need to run os.path.abspath() on both paths first
or you will wrongly return False for some relative paths where you
should return True. Let's solve this once and for all by writing a
function that takes care of these and put it in oe.path.
(From OE-Core rev: dd3d4b0367272a5826a9a51afa26f426dd003e5d)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
singletask.lock is written out while certain tasks execute for recipes
that have externalsrc.bbclass enabled - this includes recipes in
devtool's workspace. It appears that there's a race where
singletask.lock will be there one minute and then when we try to get the
file checksum of it (since we want to know if anything in the source
tree has changed) it will be gone, and git chokes. To fix that, add
singletask.lock to .git/info/exclude in the repository, regardless of
whether we created the repository or not. In any case singletask.lock
should never be tracked by git, so this is a good thing to be doing for
that reason as well.
This fixes oe-selftest failures in test_devtool_modify that we've seen
on the Yocto Project autobuilder:
bb.data_smart.ExpansionError: Failure expanding variable
do_compile[file-checksums], expression was ${@srctree_hash_files(d)}
which triggered exception CalledProcessError: Command
'['git', 'add', '-A', '.']' returned non-zero exit status 128.
Note that this only fixes this issue for devtool; if you are using
externalsrc independently of devtool there's a chance this will still
be an issue unless you add singletask.lock to your .gitignore.
(From OE-Core rev: 334ba846c795fc0d8c73ce05a1b0882739c86650)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This module refers to oe.types, so it needs to actually import oe.types.
Fixes errors when parsing certain OE-Core recipes within the layer
index update script.
(From OE-Core rev: 26ff9d2835a24a84c7f2bf9c829a13ed568c9ea0)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
mkelfimage is about to be removed, so test_devtool_modify_git needs to
use a different recipe. psplash is a reasonable choice given it uses a
git repository (and probably will forever), and doesn't have too many
dependencies, so change the test to use that recipe instead.
(From OE-Core rev: daf583efc87faa058684dfe34df596d088caa8ef)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add a patch which has been submitted upstream to support producing
bindings for Node.js 7+. This is important to enable mraa to build with
newer Node.js versions.
Fixes [YOCTO #12293].
(From OE-Core rev: 1825473ba35b4557db99786420ca451068922223)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
acinclude.m4 is about to be removed from the lzo recipe which breaks
test_devtool_update_recipe_local_files_2. Create a synthetic recipe in
meta-selftest with some local files and use that instead.
(From OE-Core rev: ed27470fa6a9f3cc1a0eb884474fe7985babde7a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If a bug is present or the user has set PATCHTOOL = "git" on a source
tree that isn't git, if we try to perform git operations (such as
committing or changing branches) when extracting source, then we might
in fact be running those operations on the metadata repository if the
build directory is underneath, say, poky or OE-Core, and that could
make a mess. Check if the source tree is a git repository and refuse
to continue if it isn't.
(From OE-Core rev: 59ae5b7cbfeedb216a57c3f77fe52527b6c918cc)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* NATIVE_INSTALL_WORKS hasn't been used in a very long time, so there's no
need to be setting it here.
* RCONFLIGHTS was clearly a typo.
(From OE-Core rev: b0146f21765b10c1f71807372f69a286bc9c2474)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If a matching recipe is not found then return Null instead of raising
KeyError because we were blindly using None as a key for pkg_fn.
(Bitbake rev: 431e89e322850a2497157c3c0843da9df6bc9a3e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The -i option supports more than one class, but the help didn't mention
that.
(Bitbake rev: 1060955c4aa2ef66cdb4f0549f9bd8c1c332673c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you can add multiple layers at once, it stands to reason that you
should also be able to remove more than one at a time.
(Bitbake rev: 2f2033836a5ce4064d9e4f263788a563001bc008)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Allow specifying multiple layers with bitbake-layers add-layer so that
you can add more than one in a single command. This is not just useful,
it's actually pretty important if you need to add a layer and its
dependencies at the same time - since we now go through a parse process
when the layer is added, without this you have to add them all in just
the right order and wait for the parse each time which is somewhat
painful.
(Bitbake rev: ad6b14f01aa326a1c6baa31bfac33be238bce805)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you have a recipe that uses overrides to conditionally extend
SRC_URI to add additional patches, then you will often need to update
those patches if you're making other changes to the source tree (for
example if you're upgrading the underlying source). Make this possible
with devtool by creating devtool-override-* branches for each override
that conditionally appends/prepends SRC_URI, and have devtool
update-recipe / finish check each branch out in turn and update the
corresponding patches.
A current example of a recipe that does this is the quota recipe - it
applies an additional patch if musl is the selected C library (i.e.
libc-musl is in OVERRIDES).
Note that use of this functionality does require some care - in
particular, updates to patches that appear on the main branch (named
"devtool" by default) should be made there and not only on one of the
specific devtool-override-* branches that are created for each override.
The recommended procedure is to make the changes you want to make to the
main branch first, then check out and rebase each devtool-override-*
branch, testing each one by activating the corresponding configuration,
and then finally run devtool finish.
Fixes [YOCTO #11516].
(From OE-Core rev: aa87603d1ffd695027847f4df75c0406cf4e14d8)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you're not sure what changes devtool finish is going to make, or
you're not sure you're finished with your modifications, it is useful to
be able to see what devtool finish is going to do beforehand, so add
a -N/--dry-run option to make that possible.
(It's also very useful for debugging devtool finish itself.)
(From OE-Core rev: 05f2d5d2ce00c53825ccea5cd9c2262f9d27a638)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If a file is going to be effectively removed from the destination by
devtool finish, we should report that rather than just reporting that
we're removing files from the workspace. This is a little tricky because
the way we actually operate when finishing is to:
(1) remove all original files (as recorded by devtool upgrade, if that
was used)
(2) as part of updating the recipe file, remove the files from next to
the new recipe (i.e. in the workspace for an upgrade, real recipe
otherwise) corresponding to commits not in the git tree
(3) copy over remaining files from the workspace to the destination
To report the files removed with respect to what was originally there,
we need to swap steps 1 and 2 so we can see what no longer exists after
the deletion, and suppress the reporting currently done in step 2 -
however, we still want to report removal in step 2 for the non-upgrade
case, so the latter is conditional.
(From OE-Core rev: db1d663507509cac9d97d7c96ac8590478767ba2)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the files that the devtool-source class is supposed to create in the
source tree aren't found in the temporary directory then we know that
the class hasn't worked properly - say that explicitly.
(From OE-Core rev: 4621152509c037532b133e5e6d5b73bda7ddb602)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Only log one warning message instead of one per line
* Be a bit more verbose
* "if list" is more pythonic than "if len(list)"
(From OE-Core rev: 2d11e9e6e73648c1cb514c0c10111c7886acae78)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the directory where the source code extracts to changes (for
example, when upgrading iucode-tool from 1.5 to 2.1.1, the subdirectory
in the tarball changed from "iucode_tool-${PV}" to "iucode-tool-${PV}")
then handle this automatically. Also handle when it changes to match the
default S value (i.e. "${WORKDIR}/${BP}") in which case we just drop
setting S in the recipe.
Fixes [YOCTO #10939].
(From OE-Core rev: d29881a652bf03627d257a1eac5f02ec17315b8b)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
I noticed that using bitbake-layers add-layer followed by a devtool
command resulted in bitbake re-parsing all of the recipes, which is
annoying. Upon closer inspection I could see that devtool was moving the
workspace layer path to the end of BBLAYERS if it happened to be
somewhere in the middle - there's no need for it to be doing this. This
occurred because we were passing the current workspace path to remove
and the "new" path to add even if the path is not being changed, and I
think earlier versions of bb.utils.edit_bblayers_conf() didn't move the
existing entry under these circumstances as it clearly does now. Fix it
so we only pass the path to be removed if we're actually changing the
path.
(From OE-Core rev: 284426dbad91a3c52eaf7da5c58fe8a2c2dfb826)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
devtool upgrade did not properly handle setting SRC_URI checksums for
recipes that use named SRC_URI entries and also use those names in the
SRC_URI checksums. A further complication was where the name contained
an expression that changed with the version e.g. ${PV} (probably quite
rare, but the dnsmasq recipe in meta-networking is currently one such
recipe.) All of these are now handled properly.
Additionally, drop the _get_checksums() function that wasn't being
called from anywhere in the code.
Note that this now turns nowrap_vars in recipeutils.py to be a list of
regexes, hence things such as [ and ] need to be appropriately escaped.
(From OE-Core rev: c914a5e1ad6d96e316746222e5d42f2ba9110060)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
devtool finish will check if the destination layer is part of
bblayers.conf so that we avoid the user getting confused about the
recipe vanishing from their configuration if it isn't. devtool finish
also accepts a path underneath a layer so that you have a bit
more control over where it ends up. However if you used a path
underneath a layer then it wasn't converting this to the base of the
layer before checking it against BBLAYERS, thus the warning was being
shown erroneously in that case.
(From OE-Core rev: ab1b8d55e551fea3e8656aab7a786d1bfec62d0f)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the git repository for a recipe in the workspace has uncommitted
changes in it then it's possible that the user has forgotten to commit
something, so check and exit if there are any. Provide a -f/--force
option to continue in the case where the uncommitted changes aren't
needed.
Separately, if the repository is in the middle of a rebase or git am /
apply then error out (without the opportunity to force) since the user
really needs to sort this out before finishing.
(From OE-Core rev: bfebd18982c0c82ef2da63ec8f22175c93b2e308)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If S points to a subdirectory of the source rather than the "base" of
the source tree then print that rather than the subdirectory path when
telling the user they need to remove the source tree, since that is the
directory that they will need to remove.
(From OE-Core rev: 9e8808099046478e98c6cf1903dc6787d69132fc)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
After some reconsideration I think it's a bit annoying for users to be
forced to use an option to work with recipes where the file isn't in the
workspace, so let's just have these commands check the workspace first
for the recipe, and if it isn't there then load the cache and get it
that way.
(From OE-Core rev: 46683c61069a386658676a79d797062404bf1140)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Show a warning in devtool upgrade if the version is less than the
current version suggesting that the user may need to bump PE in the
recipe
* Show a warning in devtool add and devtool upgrade if the version looks
like a pre-release version suggesting using a version number that
won't mess up the progression when you come to upgrade to the final
release version.
(From OE-Core rev: 92c4d9be9ed365c449ea1ac5a18ddb15e4a36b2d)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If S points to a subdirectory of the source rather than the "base" of
the source tree then we weren't handling the oe-local-files directory
properly - it got extracted to the base of the tree but devtool
update-recipe and devtool finish assumed it would be under S which would
be the subdirectory, thus it would be missing and devtool would assume
the files had been deleted and remove them from the recipe. Record the
base of the source tree in the bbappend and read it into the in-memory
workspace so we can use that to find out where oe-local-files should be
found.
(From OE-Core rev: 30d2ea67b2c4727e23d06a35745b1afa64b130cc)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When devtool upgrade is upgrading to a new version where the source is
fetched as an archive (e.g. a tarball), we create a single commit in the
git repository that is the upgrade from the old version to the new. We
do this by extracting the old source, committing it, deleting all files,
copying in the new files, running git add on each new/changed/deleted
file, and then committing the result. When a lot of files have changed
in an upgrade (such as QEMU 2.8.1.1 -> 2.10.0) the penultimate step of
running git add it can take quite a long time; in order to reduce this
and show some feedback to the user, run git add with batches of 100
files at once and also show a progress bar. In a local test with the
aforementioned QEMU upgrade it took the time down from over 7 minutes
down to about 13 seconds.
Fixes [YOCTO #11948].
(From OE-Core rev: 8b184f6c874b60324ee107af53853687173d3434)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
With versions of git older than 2.0, "git add" on a deleted file (i.e.
in this case a file that was removed between versions) will not add the
delete to be committed by default, with the result that the rebase of
patches on top of the new branch will fail. We need to use the -A
option in order to force that for older git versions.
(From OE-Core rev: c7f4c9f050c11c0de7fcf5badcc19a8fbc6428cf)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It appears that when fixing the signature unlocking in OE-Core commit
4e9a0be32fc30fb87d65da7cd1a4015c99533aff I swapped the parameters here
and did not test it within the eSDK (it does nothing outside of the
eSDK) resulting in a TypeError when devtool upgrade was used in the
eSDK. Swap the parameters around to the correct ordering.
Fixes [YOCTO #12285].
(From OE-Core rev: 05e2c4ada7083f40866846a21fe76c852f1dfefe)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If a value was split over multiple lines (e.g. as SRC_URI usually is)
then we were inserting the value as one item in the lines list with
newlines between each line. There's nothing wrong with this if you're
writing the list out to a file, but if you want to generate a patch (as
patch_recipe_file() will do if the patch parameter is set to True) then
the diff output looks a bit odd. Split the value before adding it to the
lines list to resolve this.
(From OE-Core rev: 44f4c97234623cbd770fbc86eabb04e7e0c91061)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
find_layerdir() should really return absolute paths, so make it do so.
This fixes devtool finish not deleting files it should do after devtool
upgrade if the specified path is relative, since the devtool finish code
was assuming that find_layerdir() was returning an absolute path.
Fixes [YOCTO #12318].
(From OE-Core rev: 5e3fe00a0233d563781849a44f53885b4e924a9c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the source tree happens to contain a kernel module as an example, a
test or under a "contrib" directory then we shouldn't be picking it up
and making the determination that the entire thing is a kernel module.
An example that triggered this is zstd, which ships a kernel module
under contrib/linux-kernel:
https://github.com/facebook/zstd
(From OE-Core rev: c2b3154158d4bb0855daa56477393341139d4cf9)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We shouldn't be passing a relative path to the plugins if that's what's
been specified on the recipetool command line.
(From OE-Core rev: 949067384c5166058ebc76f931cc492dad1db645)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
With a '*' as a wildcard for the signature here we can also match a
portion of the task name with the result that we may match a sigdata
file for the wrong task. Luckily the signature is always the same
length - 32 characters - so we can simply use 32 '?' characters instead.
(A regex would have been another alternative, but the wildcard should be
effective and I felt like a regex would complicate the code more than
this solution).
Fixes [YOCTO #11763].
(From OE-Core rev: 73c6f85457361cd82d44838946aa81ba9bd1662a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The most common usage for buildhistory is with commits enabled so that
you actually collect history, rather than just keeping a snapshot of the
most recent build state, therefore default BUILDHISTORY_COMMIT to "1".
This really ought to have been the default in the beginning, I can't
really explain why it wasn't.
(From OE-Core rev: 8018a2349b7ad5ab27731c93a49603adf5f72fc2)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
In Python 3.6, glob.glob() was reimplemented to use os.scandir() (which
itself appeared in Python 3.5), thus our monkey patching of os.listdir()
here was no longer effective. The end result was not only that bitbake
wouldn't notice added recipes or bbappends with BB_SERVER_TIMEOUT set
when being run with Python 3.6 (the shipped Python version on Fedora 26
and some other distribution versions), it also broke devtool modify,
devtool upgrade and devtool extract since they rely on the ability to
create a bbappend on the fly and have bitbake pick it up.
To fix it, do the same monkey patching for os.scandir(), which needs to
be conditional upon that actually existing since we have to support
Python 3.4 that doesn't have it. Long term we should probably look for a
better way to handle this that doesn't involve monkey patching Python
library code.
Fixes [YOCTO #12185].
(Bitbake rev: d02e90db32e7ee341c2ba3be79b0627d8796bdd6)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We don't need a dependency on this variable changing, and having one
causes locked signature warnings during eSDK installation if you have
INITRAMFS_IMAGE_* set (since TOPDIR will always be different between
the eSDK and the environment in which it was built).
Relates to [YOCTO #12102].
(From OE-Core rev: 073610af04be326f9245ca91714526b390fb72cd)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
"Yocto Project Compatible" [1] is a programme which requires you meet
specific criteria including going through an application process - it is
not sufficient simply to run the script we have created here and have it
produce no warnings/errors. To avoid people being confused by the fact
that this script uses the term "compatible" or variations thereof,
substitute usage of that word with "check" instead. The functionality of
the script is unchanged.
[1] https://www.yoctoproject.org/ecosystem/yocto-project-branding-program
(From OE-Core rev: 2a6126a115f10750ea89f95629d3699ad41c5665)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To help users find the work and log directories (especially within the
eSDK) we create symlinks to these from the source tree. However during
do_buildclean we call "make clean", and some project Makefiles which
delete something like "*/*/lib" which will match files underneath the
oe-workdir symlink and fail. do_buildclean is called from do_clean which
is in turn called by devtool reset by default, and thus devtool reset is
blocked. An example of a recipe where this is visible is the openssl-qat
recipe in meta-intel.
In order to fix this, delete the symlinks at the start of do_buildclean
since we shouldn't need them at that point anyway, and thus make clean
won't be able to trip over them.
Fixes [YOCTO #11036].
(From OE-Core rev: 927b3b05a7f6b85967f7375b1942605fe8d37d0c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Alongside reworking the way devtool extracts source, we now need to
ensure that within the extensible SDK where task signatures are locked,
the signatures of the tasks for the recipes being worked on get unlocked
at the right time or otherwise we'll now get taskhash mismatches when
running devtool modify on a recipe that was included in the eSDK such as
the kernel (due to a separate bug). The existing mechanism for
auto-unlocking recipes was a little weak and was happening too late, so
I've reimplemented it so that:
(a) it gets triggered immediately when the recipe/append is created
(b) we avoid writing to the unlocked signatures file unnecessarily
(since it's a global configuration file) and
(c) within the eSDK configuration we whitelist SIGGEN_UNLOCKED_RECIPES
to avoid unnecessary reparses every time we perform one of the
devtool operations that does need to change this list.
Fixes [YOCTO #11883] (not the underlying cause, but this manifestation
of the issue).
(From OE-Core rev: 4e9a0be32fc30fb87d65da7cd1a4015c99533aff)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Since it was first implemented, devtool's source extraction (as used by
the devtool modify, extract and upgrade subcommands) ignored other recipe
dependencies - so for example if you ran devtool modify on a recipe that
fetches from svn or is compressed using xz then it would fail if those
dependencies hadn't been built first. Now that we can execute tasks in
the normal way (i.e. tinfoil.build_targets()) then we can rework it to
use that. This is slightly tricky in that the source extraction needs to
insert some logic in between tasks; luckily we can use a helper class
that conditionally adds prefuncs to make that possible.
Some side-effects / aspects of this change worth noting:
* Operations are a little slower because we have to go through the task
dependency graph generation and other startup processing. There's not
really any way to avoid this though.
* devtool extract didn't used to require a workspace, now it does
because it needs to create a temporary bbappend for the recipe. (As
with other commands the workspace be created on the fly if it doesn't
already exist.)
* I want any existing sysroot files and stamps to be left alone during
extraction since we are running the tasks off to the side, and
especially devtool extract should be able to be used without touching
these. However, this was hampered by the automatic removal process in
sstate.bbclass triggered by bb.event.ReachableStamps when the task
signatures change, thus I had to introduce a way to disable this
removal on a per-recipe basis (we still want it to function for any
dependencies that we aren't working on). To implement this I elected
to use a file written to tmp/sstate-control which gets deleted
automatically after reading so that there's less chance of stale files
affecting future sessions. I could have used a variable but this would
have needed to be whitelisted and I'd have to have poked its value in
using the setVariable command.
Fixes [YOCTO #11198].
(From OE-Core rev: 830dbd66992cbb9e731b48d56fddf8f220349666)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
In collect_bbfiles() we're monkey-patching os.listdir in order to find
which directories to watch, and then undoing that when we're finished -
however if an exception occurred for any reason there was nothing to
ensure the latter occurred. This may not have caused any issues, but as
this kind of thing really ought to be secured using try...finally just
in case, so do that.
(Bitbake rev: 013047484a03185c0ce281c53c1db4949cdc4e69)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The code that was supposed to watch directories along BBFILES for
creation of new files wasn't working in the case where the directory did
not initially contain any matching files - since in updateCache() we are
passing the directory path to add_filewatch() and the latter function
calls os.path.dirname() on the path on the assumption that it is a file
path, and thus the parent of the directory got watched but not the
directory itself. (If the directory wasn't empty everything worked fine
since add_filewatch() was called elsewhere with the path to one of the
files in that directory, and thus the directory got watched). Add a
parameter to add_filewatch() to tell it we are passing it directory
path(s) rather than file path(s).
(Bitbake rev: 47a34dee08fcc25d896a1bdf16fa86267f0b898f)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The code in scriptutils which implements the logic for running the
editor used by devtool edit-recipe looks at the VISUAL environment
variable before EDITOR, and thus if VISUAL is set in the environment it
will override the EDITOR value we are setting here, the editor (usually
vim) launches and there's nothing to stop it running forever short of
manually killing it. Set VISUAL instead to fix this.
Apparently VISUAL is in fact the variable we should really be preferring
here - I don't think I knew that but somehow I got it right in the code,
just not in the test. Here are the details for the curious:
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/4859/visual-vs-editor-whats-the-difference
Fixes [YOCTO #12074].
(From OE-Core rev: 6a7c50def569b5e86aa17bd9b287e8c63781dcb0)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Printing the last 10 lines of bitbake-cookerdaemon.log when the server
fails to start can sometimes result in printing the output from a
previous run, which could lead the user completely down the wrong path
in terms of the cause of the failure. Use a known start text containing
the time which we can then look for when scanning through the log, and
then grab the last 10 lines of that part instead.
Fixes [YOCTO #11903].
(Bitbake rev: 567f2cf1bc455b4f3cfb1cbd7f25145360b05a62)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The whitelist shouldn't have to be populated in order for the
enforcement to work properly - check if the list is not None in order to
determine whether the functionality is enabled or not since that is how
the function that sets up the list behaves.
(Bitbake rev: 7b1e79c352ca6eef1693d8abfacf7505544f1caa)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If user.name or user.email haven't been set then git rebase can't really
work properly. Check that the user has set these and error out if not.
(Elsewhere we are relying on OE's git patch functionality which forces
a dummy OE value - that's OK there as it's completely under OE's control
and therefore it's OK for a dummy OE user to be the committer, but here
the rebase may require intervention so it's reasonable to have the
user's actual name and email on the operation.)
Fixes [YOCTO #11947].
(From OE-Core rev: 129a3be07e272013be2db17552c13b4d8cc2cf6e)
(From OE-Core rev: 802829f1c38d8c5eee11ba1d9ddd37cf02597f6e)
Signed-off-by: paul <paul@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When the UI disconnects, we can throw away any server-side remote
datastores we created in response to calls from the UI, and we *must*
drop everything in extraconfigdata or it will taint any future
operations.
Dropping extraconfigdata upon disconnect fixes taskhash mismatch errors
when running devtool.DevtoolTests.test_devtool_update_recipe_local_files
within oe-selftest with BB_SERVER_TIMEOUT=100 in OpenEmbedded.
(Bitbake rev: 1ca2eec459424892391f060442ef38cf28d6a54a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If we're implementing reset() in SignatureGenerator at all (and we need
to for a basic non-OE BitBake setup where that is the default signature
generator), then we need it to be clearing out the internal values
properly.
(Bitbake rev: 13f52d38fdbcb84c2a0c46f85baa44b22d53fdc1)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When fetching source for the first time within scripts such as
OpenEmbedded's recipetool, we don't want to be showing warnings about
NPM_SHRINKWRAP or NPM_LOCKDOWN not being set since there's no way we
could have set them in advance. Previously we were using
ud.ignore_checksums to suppress these but since we are now using a more
standard task-based path to fetch the source, we need to disable these
through the metadata. Look for a "noverify" parameter set on the npm URL
and skip the checks if it is set to "1".
(Bitbake rev: 8c4b35d1e4d31bae9fddd129d5ba230acb72c3bb)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you run some other operations that result in the cache being
populated, and then call buildFileInternal(), then you can end up in a
situation where the cache already contains information about the recipe.
For example in OE this can now happen when you use devtool upgrade.
Normally this doesn't cause any problems, unless you have a non-absolute
path in BBLAYERS - in buildFileInternal() we are calling matchfile() which
will convert the filename to absolute, but later when taskdata goes to find
the providers of the recipe it finds the non-absolute path, sets up the
task information using this and then the runqueue can't find any tasks
matching the absolute path. To fix this, back out the optimisation I did
earlier in bitbake rev ba53e067a2d448dd63b4ca252557ce98aa8e6321 to avoid
calling parseConfiguration() again, which is unfortunate but does result
in the cached information being that causes the problem being cleared
out.
This fixes "Task do_unpack does not exist for target ..." running
devtool upgrade within intel-iot-refkit.
(Bitbake rev: f120355eaec4571ba6d60fc5f7ae9e1f31d846d1)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you set tracking=True when creating the tinfoil object, that ensures
history is collected for the main datastore, but at the end of parsing
the configuration, history tracking gets turned off to save time with
the result that we don't collect history for any recipes we parse.
Enable tracking when we parse a recipe (and disable it afterwards if we
enabled it) in order to fix this.
This fixes functionality in OE's devtool that relies upon variable
history (such as devtool upgrade updating PV when it's set within a
recipe).
(Bitbake rev: cc8b4c81bb589fb70774a0151f87a8d277f40f06)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If a task fails during build_targets(), we need to print out the log
lines as knotty does or the user will be missing information about the
failure.
(This should get some deeper refactoring, but now isn't the time for
that.)
(Bitbake rev: 24879df071d4803db3d39ae1d5cad852daa92f28)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
With config_only=False we launch the UI and it sets up a logger, whereas
when config_only=True we don't, with the result that with True we are
seeing log messages from both our logger and the one set up by the UI.
Suppress our loggers with config_only=True to avoid this.
Fixes [YOCTO #11275] (again).
(Bitbake rev: b5e3b28b7c982dd8a3991d727f25710dbf58bb80)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
In OE-Core commit a48fea275b, a check on
the value of a "sha256" parameter was added, however there was no
mention of this in the commit message and no corresponding code to
actually verify the checksum as sha256 was added along with it either,
so there's no point in getting the value. Additionally it was assuming
that a sha256 value would be present without checking first, with the
result that if you leave out the md5 value in a recipe intentionally in
order to get it to tell you the correct value on the next build, you got
a traceback instead of the appropriate error containing the information.
Drop this entirely - if we want to implement this we need to do it
properly.
(From OE-Core rev: e9eaa7d15fe7ab643ab19556dab84051f8f1974e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
recipetool create (and hence devtool add) and devtool upgrade use
fetch_url() which creates a dummy recipe in order to fetch source.
Previously the random part of the name was using uppercase characters,
and this triggers a QA warning after OE-Core commit
4713f8b2c4f2c74239d284adcf1e59e61aa66576, so use lowercase instead as I
really should have in the first place.
(From OE-Core rev: b48c48b00e82491d1c69e4d89a79c6242361abec)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
I recently found that variable history wasn't working properly for
recipes when we enable history tracking, resulting in minor
functionality loss in devtool upgrade, so add a test to ensure this
doesn't regress now that it's fixed.
(From OE-Core rev: f49042e707d641b59a71c687374b76df97c64c34)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Since OE-Core revision 9a47a6690052ef943c0d4760630ee630fb012153 the
mechanism we were using to suppress the warnings about
NPM_LOCKDOWN and NPM_SHRINKWRAP not being set on the first fetch of the
source is no longer available since we are using the normal fetch/unpack
tasks to do the job. Use the newly added noverify parameter to suppress
the warnings again.
(From OE-Core rev: cb083b6f5f6e909b7c85548bcb1a92ca34d0c18a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you're fetching from an SCM other than git (for example subversion or
mercurial) then we need to use a different prefix for the SRCPV in PV
instead of +git.
(From OE-Core rev: ad1200c8729f21b325d347649f9dd5e5598de93e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The branch and tag handling code that was recently added in OE-Core revs
ecca596b75cfda2f798a0bdde75f4f774e23a95b and
3afdcbdc9a3e65bc925ec61717784ffec67d529d is specific to git, so only
apply it when we're fetching from a git URL.
(From OE-Core rev: 5d4bfe6cf788ce971a2e9419bc13492153023681)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
At the moment when fetching source from a git repository you have to
know that you can specify the revision and branch in the URL with
';rev=' and ';branch=' respectively, and you can also get thrown off by
the shell splitting on the ; character if you forget to surround the URL
in quotes. Add explicit -S/--srcrev and -B/--srcbranch options
(consistent with devtool upgrade) to make this easier for the user to
discover and use. (The rev and branch URL parameters will continue to
work, however.)
(From OE-Core rev: 2d86cac853d6daa496c0315a5cb0662ebf1165b0)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We weren't testing the devtool find-recipe and edit-recipe subcommands,
with the result that when they regressed recently we didn't notice. Add
some code into the test_devtool_add to test this (since we need a
recipe in the workspace, and adding a new test with all that preamble
would seem a bit excessive for these simple checks). Also take the
opportunity to refactor the test a little bit so that the recipe name
and version are variables rather than hardcoding them everywhere.
(From OE-Core rev: 355d8f42679e37610c2947dece597ed7db774bee)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
OE-Core commit 5a16b3c804c5eca331a1c08a7ce31a54909af105 attempted to use
the same function to get the path to a recipe as the new "find-recipe"
command it implemented, except that cannot work because (a) it didn't
return anything and (b) event if it had tried, a command function can
only return an exit code and we don't want that for find-recipe if it
succeeded. Split out a separate reusable function for both commands.
(From OE-Core rev: d5191840212adbf480961ba6fc68e1ab17e5a77a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If we're upgrading a recipe that appends additional patches for, say,
class-native, and we're just upgrading the target variant, then when we
copied the recipe into the workspace we skipped copying the additional patches
for the native variant. This caused warnings because the workspace
recipe is preferred. Look at SRC_URI for all variants when copying files
to work around this.
More work is needed to make it easier to work with recipes that use
BBCLASSEXTEND where you need to build more than one variant at once, but
this at least fixes the immediate ugliness.
(From OE-Core rev: 56bf5e93358187e31160d7893f57906bb3dc7ad7)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If your BBLAYERS has non-absolute paths in it (e.g.
"${COREBASE}/../something") then none of the paths matched in
copy_recipe_files() with the result that no files got copied and you
ended up with an error later on because the recipe file couldn't be
found at the destination. Fix this as well as adding an explicit check
to see if no files got copied - error out earlier if so.
Fixes [YOCTO #10981].
(From OE-Core rev: 3861486ad06f90c8644ebab119bbc5ddb9e693ca)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Patches that we identify as having been "deleted" (i.e. patches in
SRC_URI that no longer appear in the git tree) need to be dropped even
if we're updating in srcrev mode. This fixes the case where HEAD of the
git tree is valid upstream (i.e. no extra commits), but there are
patches left over in the recipe, e.g. when we do devtool upgrade and
then all of the commits rebased on top of the new branch get skipped.
Fixes [YOCTO #11972].
(From OE-Core rev: 350f83dc1e317aeb93539f13966caca6d894f569)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
URLs do not have to have a path; currently our npm URLs don't, so
encodeurl() needs to handle if the path element isn't specified. This
fixes errors using OpenEmbedded's devtool add / recipetool create on an
npm URL after OE-Core revision ecca596b75cfda2f798a0bdde75f4f774e23a95b
that uses decodeurl() and encodeurl() to change URL parameter values.
(Bitbake rev: d5cab2dbf5682d2fd08e58316a3bf39a10f63df2)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
OE-Core commit 1df60b09f7a60427795ec828c9c7180e4e52f98c caused a
regression in npm handling since it still expected to be able to get the
results of the license handling, but this no longer happens until after
the npm plugin is called. Thus, call the license handling function
ourselves here (which will record this as having been handled so it
doesn't get done again later).
(From OE-Core rev: 3e408aadaea85b6f192b34d37d508cbaf3cd7164)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
With "import oe" in create_npm.py you get "AttributeError: module 'oe'
has no attribute 'package'" when it tries to call
oe.package.npm_split_package_dirs().
(From OE-Core rev: 1261900aeac725e5712e0180600753a9d4c67e60)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We were being a bit prescriptive in setting LICENSE and
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM. We can't always trust what's in the metadata
accompanying some source which plugins will almost always be pulling
from, however we do want to allow plugins to set the LICENSE and
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM values. Merge what we find in our license file scan
with what the plugin sends back.
Additionally, plugins can now add a "license" item to the handled list
in order to inhibit the normal LICENSE / LIC_FILES_CHKSUM handling if
they have already taken care of it completely.
Thanks to Mark Horn <mark.d.horn@intel.com> for prompting, testing and
fixing this patch.
(From OE-Core rev: 1df60b09f7a60427795ec828c9c7180e4e52f98c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Previously if we were able to auto-determine the name from the URL, that
took precedence over any name that might be set in extravalues by a
plugin. Some plugins might be able to get a better idea of the name and
thus we should move defaulting of the name further down after the
plugins have had a chance to set it.
(From OE-Core rev: 3bb979c13463705c4db6c59034661c4cd8100756)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We have two variables here, srcuri and fetchuri. srcuri is what
eventually ends up in the recipe, whereas fetchuri is what we actually
pass to the fetcher when we fetch the source within recipetool -
sometimes these need to be different particularly for an upcoming patch
to handle automatically setting the branch parameter. In OE-Core
revision 9a47a6690052ef943c0d4760630ee630fb012153 I erroneously changed
the call to scriptutils.fetch_url() to pass srcuri instead of fetchuri -
this likely didn't have any ill effect, but change it back to passing
fetchuri to match the original intent.
(From OE-Core rev: b66b73bcf5ee7e4488970576fdc31dfa25b35f5e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
In combination with the recent server reworking, this change actually
prevents messages sent from tasks from being logged properly. This will
of course give us the duplicated messages back, and I really hate to do
that effectively a second time, but that's better than seeing no error
at all in the case of a failure - we'll have to find the proper way of
avoiding the duplication that doesn't result in some messages going
missing.
This reverts commit 8a5bae76f91f2411187c638a42fa3c762052cf11.
(Bitbake rev: 645c8dd15762516ae5ab64a1df47fadb95d072d1)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* If an error is logged while executing a task, we need to ensure we
exit instead of assuming everything went OK.
* If we receive CookerExit, the server is shutting down and we need to
stop waiting for events and probably exit (knotty does this). This
will occur if an exception or bb.fatal() happens during an event
handler.
This fixes a couple of issues highlighted when using devtool upgrade or
modify on a non-supported recipe with intel-iot-refkit together with
bitbake master, but I'd be very surprised if it were hard to reproduce
in other scenarios.
(From OE-Core rev: 65e644368fc9c294af96906528ee0cf30305e0a6)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We don't need to reparse recipes just because BB_SERVER_TIMEOUT changed,
so exclude it from the config hash.
(From OE-Core rev: a686fcabacd49fdb814e646305c1f33fee1d5abf)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We were bridging the gap between the server and UI here by calling a
bb.siggen.find_siginfo, a function defined and set on that module from
the metadata. This worked from the UI side before but since the recent
server changes is no longer accessible. Create a new command so this can
execute on the server side and return the result by way of a new event.
(We're still running compare_sigfiles() on the signature generator but
that isn't quite the same thing and does still work.)
Fixes [YOCTO #11844].
(Bitbake rev: fdcea991baa4f83d9c98d468d7b49c8c388a4a15)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
wic will attempt to use pseudo from the wic-tools sysroot to run, but it
was only sure to be in there if do_install had executed - which is not
the case if it had been restored from sstate, in which case it failed
horribly as seen when running the wic.Wic.test_fs_types and
test_mkfs_extraopts tests on the Yocto Project autobuilder recently. Add
an explicit dependency on pseudo-native to ensure it's always there.
(From OE-Core rev: ada7408a55ec58e4aa1b094462f8a681e60be613)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Across devtool and recipetool we had an ugly set of code for ensuring
that we can call an npm binary, and much of that ugliness was a result
of not being able to run build tasks when tinfoil was active - if
recipetool found that npm was required and we didn't know beforehand
(e.g. we're fetching from a plain git repository as opposed to an npm://
URL where it's obvious) then it had to exit and return a special result
code, so that devtool knew it needed to build nodejs-native and then
call recipetool again. Now that we are using real build tasks to fetch
and unpack, we can drop most of this and move the code to the one place
where it's still needed (i.e. create_npm where we potentially have to
deal with node.js code in a plain source repository).
(From OE-Core rev: 8450de16ddb02d863204b411a94c6d84e0f88817)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If we're unpacking any rpm (not just .src.rpm) then we'll need to call
rpm2cpio.sh. As of OE-Core rev a7da1aade118d1ccf1b286f82556cd9f706bd2a4
that script no longer uses file-native, but there is a chance that the
rpm file will be compressed internally using xz (for example, rpms from
Fedora) and therefore the script will need xzcat provided xz-native.
(From OE-Core rev: 2f31f1795bc0c85b1646bc7d9596bbe778cb84e5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Now that we have the ability to run the tasks in a more standard context
through tinfoil, change recipetool's fetching code to use that to fetch
files using it. This has the major advantage that any dependencies of
do_fetch and do_unpack (e.g. for subversion or npm) will be handled
automatically. This also has the beneficial side-effect of fixing a
recent regression that prevented this fetch operation from working with
memory resident bitbake.
Also fix devtool's usage of fetch_uri() at the same time so that we can
completely replace it.
Fixes [YOCTO #11710].
(From OE-Core rev: 9a47a6690052ef943c0d4760630ee630fb012153)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When dealing with package files (.rpm, .ipk etc.) we need to unpack them
ourselves to get the metadata, which is thrown away when the fetcher
unpacks them. However, since we've already fetched the file once, I'm
not sure as to why I thought I needed to fetch it again - we can just
get the local path and then unpack it directly.
(From OE-Core rev: be45e9b17e9dbc8c2594d3a939be377ab0720a7c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you pointed recipetool at a URL that should be a tarball e.g.
https://tls.mbed.org/download/start/mbedtls-2.4.2-apache.tgz but instead
it returns an HTML page, we try to unpack it, gzip complains but the
operation doesn't seem to fail - instead we just get back an empty
source tree. Change the checks to account for this - if the source tree
is empty, check if the downloaded file in DL_DIR looks like an HTML file
and error accordingly if it is. If it's not, error out anyway because
no source was unpacked and it should have been (otherwise we just
blindly set up EXTERNALSRC for this which is pointless).
Fixes an aspect of [YOCTO #11407].
(From OE-Core rev: 8496113b63d5a5d1f99056610c0fdb972a6200d4)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When extracting linux-yocto kernel source, we don't need to dance around
shutting down and starting up tinfoil anymore, we can just execute the
tasks as needed when needed using tinfoil's new build_targets()
function. This allows us to tidy up the code structure a bit.
(From OE-Core rev: 5c7f5031023fb74b5f2f26d6b3c829981f2f54d2)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
These messages were added for debugging during the recipe specific
sysroot work. They may still be useful but they don't need to be notes -
if they are they show up in recipetool / devtool output when fetching
source.
(From OE-Core rev: a0e93d5c5dcf59d1898a3db727a5ab2d75e3d20e)
(From OE-Core rev: bc1a4af950a2600028d89b7dcb4ff8f409b52739)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If BB_STRICT_CHECKSUMS is set to anything other than "1" i.e. we're not
going to raise an error, then fire an event so that scripts can listen
for it and get the checksums.
(Bitbake rev: 8b2ccb4b865f2df118ef668847df682a83f9c500)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Paul Eggleton