This should have been register_commands rather than register_command;
I used register_commands in devtool so lets change this here to be
consistent with that. (Since this is extensible through layers though we
need to remain compatible with the old name, so fall back to that if the
new function name isn't there.)
(From OE-Core rev: 1047f6592ac81643cd847f104da766dc4a4c81ea)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add a recipetool subcommand "setvar" to set a variable in a file. This
uses our existing logic such that it doesn't matter if the variable is
already set in the recipe, if it's set in the recipe or some inc file,
and if the variable is not currently set that the line setting the
variable gets inserted in the right place in the file.
Implements [YOCTO #7676].
(From OE-Core rev: 7c33ef77fa165182d24f0a9ae769e9e630e6bd47)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Use bb.utils.edit_metadata() to replace some of the logic in this
function; this avoids us effectively having two implementations of the
same thing. In the process fix the following issues:
* Insert values before any leading comments for the next variable
instead of after them
* Insert overridden variables (e.g. RDEPENDS_${PN}) in the correct place
* Properly handle replacing varflag settings (e.g. SRC_URI[md5sum])
(From OE-Core rev: 0f81b83fc5fd908efa7f6b837137830ca65f6ed6)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Make some minor clarifications to help text
* Drop ArgumentDefaultsHelpFormatter and just put the defaults in the
text itself where needed (because otherwise you get defaults shown for
store_true options which is somewhat confusing).
(From OE-Core rev: a90ffea30c4578fd6acda2c5945b816ad33b13f5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Enable access to the configuration object in register_commands() so that
we can read configuration values there; this allows us to show the
task that will be run in the command line help for the build subcommand.
(From OE-Core rev: 142d006de3235a034839ef7bbe147c56fc7af04a)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Use a bbappend file to set PARALLEL_MAKE instead of a postfile; this
is a bit neater and only affects the specified recipe.
(From OE-Core rev: b5bafc845892ac39f85f3642b120fb7b785a3d58)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Ensure that the user specifies just the name portion instead of a file
name with extension. (We can't just look for . since there are recipe
names such as "glib-2.0" that legitimately contain .).
(From OE-Core rev: a4c6af737811adb2bca87e3896f8710738dd255e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This is just belt-and-braces but we ought to use try..finally in this
kind of situation, so just do it.
(From OE-Core rev: a30b407474d4eb6620f1ec549b54187ebbaff008)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
For patches that we have to extract the header information by hand (i.e.
will not apply with "git am"), make the following improvements:
* If we can't extract author/date/subject, then try to do so from the
commit that added the patch in git (assuming the metadata is tracked
by git)
* Take only first Signed-off-by line instead of last
* Accept any case for "Signed-off-by" in case author has typed it by
hand
* Improve conditional - we can skip the other cases if one matches
Implements [YOCTO #7624].
(From OE-Core rev: 13ec296b5c35aefa2c44f64f8bd1ef54c4a0a731)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you're upgrading a git recipe to a revision on a release branch
that's different to the branch for the current revision, then you'll
need to update the branch parameter in SRC_URI, so add a --srcbranch/-B
command-line parameter to let you do that easily. It handles both when
the branch is stated verbatim in the recipe, and when a reference to
another variable is used (a common convention is to use a SRCBRANCH
variable for this, though the code doesn't care what variable is used
if any).
(From OE-Core rev: e49a66fd898dd44e54c77a838ebef3d983ed2a03)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If we're upgrading a recipe that fetches from git, and we've simply
fetched a tarball of the repo instead of directly from the upstream repo
(this can happen if you have PREMIRRORS set up as in poky with a core recipe,
e.g. kernelshark) then we won't have any new revisions, and the checkout
will fail with "fatal: reference is not a tree: <hash>". To avoid this,
do a "git fetch" before checking out the new revision.
(From OE-Core rev: c4daebf3fe797a8063dcbc2ab229be2fbedc8134)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If we're upgrading a git recipe the recipe file usually won't need
renaming; for some unknown reason we were throwing an error here which
isn't correct.
(From OE-Core rev: 656348dff9bc9dd1cafc8fff11e5e374e3667f0f)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This code was clearly never tested. Fix the following issues:
* Actually set SRCREV if it's been specified
* Enable history tracking and reparse so that we handle if variables are
set in an inc file next to the recipe
* Use a more accurate check for PV being in the recipe which will work
if it's in an inc file next to the recipe
(From OE-Core rev: 8b8f04226ebf464fa61c05ca7af7c6cbda392339)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you did a "devtool add" followed by "devtool upgrade" and then did
a "devtool reset" on the recipe you upgraded, the first recipe would
also be deleted from the workspace - this was because we were
erroneously adding the entire "recipes" subdirectory and its contents to
be tracked for removal on reset. Remove the unnecessary call to
os.path.dirname() that caused this.
(From OE-Core rev: 65354e066f87df7d3138adceb22d6a05d1685904)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you put an $ character in the path, SDK installation fails during the
preparation stage, so add this to the disallowed characters.
Fixes [YOCTO #8625].
(From OE-Core rev: 654f4785f719552f4e78e14a5a901c07d00ce68d)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Print some status when running
* When incorrect number of arguments specified, print usage text
(From OE-Core rev: ac38d245878b618ddf56f9a68834d344500e45a6)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The extensible SDK relies upon uninative, and with the way that
uninative works, the build system architecture must be the same as the
SDK architecture or the extensible SDK won't be usable. At some point in
future hopefully we can remove this limitation, but until then it's
disingenuous to allow this to build, so add a check to ensure
SDK_ARCH == BUILD_ARCH and fail if it isn't.
(From OE-Core rev: 9e30e849eda3b0a0c54d3f7ed0102760fdaef06c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you have a local workspace layer enabled when building the
extensible SDK, we explicitly exclude that from the SDK (mostly because
the SDK has its own for the user to use). Adjust the message we print
notifying the user of this so it's clear that we're excluding it from
the SDK, and scale it back from a warning to a note printed with
bb.plain().
(From OE-Core rev: 90f46f74a088a7b965d2205eceb9eff6f276dd38)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When SDK preparation fails:
* Insert an ERROR: in front of the error message
* Add an error message to the environment setup script
Hopefully this should make it more obvious when this happens.
Fixes [YOCTO #8658].
(From OE-Core rev: 105df569b3b1982005c2edb37f4690f9ba6bde35)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Use a variable for the log file which includes the full path; this is
not only neater but avoids us writing the first part (the output of
oe-init-build-env) to a file in another directory since we are
changing directory as part of this subshell.
(From OE-Core rev: 001af71752a9e9aab460cbd49ed049e1eb726295)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Fixes the following warning sometimes appearing during image builds:
WARNING: The license listed ABC was not in the licenses collected for recipe xyz
The files being looked for here, which runs during do_rootfs,
are written out by the do_populate_lic task for each recipe. However,
there was no explicit dependency between do_rootfs and all of the
do_populate_lic tasks to ensure they had run - only an implicit link via
do_build, so it is possible that sometimes they had not depending on how
the tasks were scheduled. Add an explicit set of dependencies to fix
this.
(From OE-Core rev: ef7dc532e800d9b170246550cbc8703adf624beb)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Fixes the following error showing up for layers that aren't a git repo
(or aren't parented by one):
fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git
This was because we weren't intercepting stderr. We might as well just
use bb.process.run() here which does that and returns stdout and stderr
separately.
(This was a regression that came in with OE-Core revision
3aac11076e).
Fixes [YOCTO #8661].
(From OE-Core rev: f533c1bf4c6edbecc67f9e2c62fd475d64668e86)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We weren't splitting SRC_URI values containing multiple URIs here; this
didn't cause any errors except when a trailing ; was left on a URI, in
which case the next URI was considered part of the parameter, which
didn't contain a = and therefore was considered invalid.
We only care about the first URI in SRC_URI in this context (since
that's the upstream URI by convention) so split it as we should and take
the first item.
Fixes [YOCTO #8645].
(From OE-Core rev: 8e75b7e7d54e5638b42b9e7f90f2c6c17e62033f)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We don't actually use values we read in here that are likely to
contain = characters but we might as well split the value properly in
case we do in future.
(From OE-Core rev: afe100436bdeefb024b924ee27ad68830f085ff4)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This was excluding any subdirectory anywhere in the tree named build*,
rather than just at the root - thus anything in
meta/recipes-devtools/build-compare had to be forcibly added. Change the
line so that it only operates at the root of the repo.
(From OE-Core rev: 3a60e5dba0ea914b1bd7a2073c1977e1d8529541)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* We need to check all recipe files, not just the preferred ones
(i.e. we have multiple recipes for different versions of the same
piece of software). Print the recipe file name (without path) so we
can tell the difference between them.
* We can skip BBCLASSEXTENDed variants of recipes
(From OE-Core rev: 3e81d209fd8c76fce5bee19acb591483c1335119)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We tend not to use any variables in HOMEPAGE values, but that doesn't
mean we would never do so.
(From OE-Core rev: 388737270b681439b31f4e1189bdc09d38705f25)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We need to handle keyword arguments here or sending a keyword argument
to a decorated function that accepts keyword arguments will trigger an
error. (This showed up when testcase decorators were added to the
recipetool.RecipetoolTests.test_recipetool_appendsrcfiles_basic_subdir
test).
(From OE-Core rev: f787b688f2884ce3fa888b4041030538c7d2bf55)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
For modify / extract / upgrade, if the specified "recipe" is not
actually a recipe but a virtual target such as virtual/kernel, map it
correctly to the actual recipe and make sure we use that name within the
workspace. Thanks to Chris Larson for reminding me this was still broken
and for a hint on how to fix it.
(From OE-Core rev: 1f7752282ffb47d2621030ddb2fa42a5e491d6d2)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Print a line that's the full length of the title that it's underneath.
(From OE-Core rev: 83729437c584fc74577a2b15dbb2ae094788339d)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you run the extensible SDK environment setup script in a shell
session where oe-init-build-env has been run already, and attempt to use
the two together, strange things happen - you may not even be running
devtool from the extensible SDK, but the OE tree. This isn't a supported
use case anyway, so show a warning recommending starting a new shell
session.
(From OE-Core rev: 41afc48ab979dff6ebb3ea4003dd6baefff7f644)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Print a note at the end of the environment setup script pointing to
devtool.
(From OE-Core rev: ea1d566bc2ff61f2e086effb9ca6551b263eacbe)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
In order to prepare the build system within the extensible SDK, we
actually go ahead and build the targets specified by SDK_TARGETS (by
default the image the SDK was built for). Assuming that's an image, we
don't actually need to build the image itself - we just need to have
everything done up to the point before building the image, so that we
have everything needed in the sysroot.
In order to do this, create temporary bbappends for each of the targets
in the workspace layer that stub out do_rootfs and related tasks if they
exist. This is a little bit of a hack but is the least intrusive fix at
this point. To make things a bit tidier, I have split out the
preparation commands into a separate script so we can run that in the
appropriate environment rather than all the commands separately.
Fixes [YOCTO #7590].
(From OE-Core rev: d2a2962897b89731a5705b0cbc7c6f36aa53dcc8)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Make indentation consistent here in preparation for the changes that
follow.
(From OE-Core rev: 59a3789c678bf58c0a04b8def416246654680841)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
As part of populating the sstate-cache with an artifact (.tgz file) we
create a temp file and then atomically move it to the final name. Due to
the glob used in this script such temp files were being matched, and
between the time they were matched and the time the script started
copying files, the temp file may have vanished.
This fixes random "No such file or directory" failures building the
extensible SDK on build setups where the sstate-cache directory is shared
amongst multiple build machines.
(From OE-Core rev: 588de5198c641ea1cfc3e01a6d129296bd2f706b)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If recipe parsing fails we need to exit out instead of attempting to use
the data object that's set to None, which resulted in a traceback.
(From OE-Core rev: a46fb1a06be2df00a0bceb4e60ebdecb55b5974c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
OE-Core commit 57af3fb9662106f0a65a1b4edf83e2398be0a8f1 upgraded tzdata
but also reverted a couple of changes to SUMMARY and LIC_FILES_CHKSUM.
Reinstate these (with an update to the README md5 value since that has
changed slightly, without any change to the licensing statements
within).
(From OE-Core rev: cea4f6b86129f84a99700207777929bf7e811ed6)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We don't need PATCHTOOL to be set to git in this recipe, and setting it
that way requires that the running user has git user & email configured,
which on a build server it might well not be.
(From OE-Core rev: ae8dcdc3c8e090fe392de86dc59135a38f06e9ca)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the directory specified by --extract-to exists, because we were using
shutil.move() to move the temporary extracted directory to the specified
path, a subdirectory was being created under that directory instead of
moving the contents, which was a different result than if the directory
didn't previously exist. We could try to always move the contents but
that's complicated when any symlinks are involved; the simplest thing is
just to remove the directory (which should be empty anyway) before
moving the temporary directory across in its place.
(From OE-Core rev: 2880bd23b471c1966661b9f05726faf60f9c0e7e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Use "git cherry" against the original tag that we made when we extracted
the source in order to find the revisions that are definitely new. This
allows you to modify a commit in the middle of the series and then run
devtool update-recipe and not have the subsequent patches unnecessarily
modified.
Fixes [YOCTO #8388].
(From OE-Core rev: 7baf57ad896112cf2258b3e2c2a1f8b756fb39bc)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We only need the base configuration to get the variable values we want
to get here, there's no need to parse recipes / load the cache.
(From OE-Core rev: 84172ff7b325f081dba6430fd27f12e3745838b5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Adds a subcommand to search to find the target recipe name providing
some file or capability. This is implemented by searching on recipe
name, package name, description, package contents (file names), and
runtime file provides. For example:
$ devtool search libGL
mesa
$ devtool search X11
xextproto
libxxf86vm
xf86driproto
xf86vidmodeproto
libxfixes
xproto
libx11
...
$ devtool search /bin/sed
busybox
sed
This is particularly useful within the extensible SDK but is also made
available in devtool alongside the build system.
Note of course that because this searches pkgdata, useful results depend
upon do_packagedata(_setscene) having executed for the recipe being
searched for.
(From OE-Core rev: 48cbde0ea77ed20126eceba5feb37c42a9229500)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We ship the runqemu script and if we build QEMU itself within the
extensible SDK, then it would be nice to be able to run it. This is a
very thin wrapper around runqemu, supplying the machine and image name
so the user doesn't need to. (This subcommand is only available within
the extensible SDK since it only really makes sense there where it is
otherwise hard to run runqemu directly.)
Implements [YOCTO #6657].
(From OE-Core rev: abca7a0cac7068ffe6a6b873d0842f804388b621)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add a means of creating recipes for package files or archives that
contain a directory structure to be installed verbatim, for example an
rpm file. (We mostly just re-use bin_package here and skip some of the
normal build system checks.) This support is available in "recipetool
create" and "devtool add" which wraps the former.
(From OE-Core rev: 9e0a6b2e6f16185f8032d36b77d40802bc388987)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Upon further reflection, it seems to me that this bbappend ought to just
be deleted at the end of the build. This keeps things simple; you never
have to remember to delete any files to get back to where you were
before with the image. This means we can also drop the slightly awkward
message reminding the user how to do that. I've also updated the test to
look at the image manifest to determine if the command has worked
instead of looking for the (now deleted) bbappend.
(From OE-Core rev: f6b90bceaedf9bad3d111e6ca1fa79e59f472c73)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Make image optional for the extensible SDK (auto-determine it based on
the targets the SDK was built for)
* Check that specified recipe is in fact an image
(From OE-Core rev: 8884875aacfedc69cc72898684e391e69fea00ba)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the user is running "devtool build-image" within the extensible SDK
then they probably won't know where to find the resulting output files,
so we should tell them explicitly.
(From OE-Core rev: 9baf9fd7a53142a98c7f1cd49c7b001760af51f9)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
We build recipes and include packages into the image, adjust the
terminology used in code and messages accordingly. Also fix a few typos.
(From OE-Core rev: 866f6e2de20b7022803e53c4de3ff341521b4db5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If we end up printing a message about the build directory being the same
as the source, we should print that first and then print the message
about the recipe file possibly needing to be edited to the end so that
it has slightly more impact.
(From OE-Core rev: 97398d14c444fe2408dd6101ef46a0a406924bb5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If the fetched source isn't already a git repository, initialise it as
one and then branch and tag, just as we do with "devtool modify". This
makes it easier to make changes, commit them and then use the
"devtool update-recipe" command to turn those commits into patches
on the recipe.
(From OE-Core rev: 2dd865086c37c9eff63c6d0bbfa9f2e909f9fffe)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Some recipes don't extract any source (for example, opkg-keyrings). We
were producing a traceback in this case because we weren't checking if
the directory existed.
(From OE-Core rev: 087ca0c644aad19e6e7d3921f99f3056471deb65)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Recipes that use work-shared (such as libgcc) are capable of unpacking
the source, but it doesn't necessarily unpack to ${WORKDIR}/${BP}. Use
the last part of the actual S value instead which is more likely to
work.
(From OE-Core rev: 0bab8086fdef93b88d5ec6b88b07ccc921dd786f)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you try to use "devtool modify -x" or "devtool extract" on a recipe
where do_unpack has been set as noexec (e.g. glibc-locale), then we get
an error because the expected source wasn't ever unpacked. Do a check up
front for noexec being set on do_unpack and error out with a reasonable
message if that's the case.
(From OE-Core rev: 39a93c85e798e72edd6ab3c05f8adbb1a97e893e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The # character in a URI denotes a fragment; we don't care about this
since it is never supposed to be sent to the server, so remove it from
the URI before actually trying to fetch it or use it in SRC_URI within
the recipe.
(This has come up because download links on pypi.python.org seem to have
a fragment containing the md5sum of the download; without stripping this
off the fetcher will choke on it.)
(From OE-Core rev: 58dc726808817210764eab963a4d453dc4ff49aa)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The shell considers empty functions to be a syntax error, so for
template shell functions that contain only comments (or no lines at all)
then add a : to act as a no-op which avoids the syntax error.
(From OE-Core rev: ff14d9e5b935b99b2efde479515e54c02ba58f6e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
When we were adding a recipe for software that would typically be built
in the same directory as the source, we were always using a separate
build directory unless the user explicitly specified not to, leading to
errors for software that doesn't expect to be built that way (such as
Python modules using distutils). Split out the code that makes this
determination automatically from the "devtool modify" and "devtool
upgrade" code and re-use that here so the behaviour is consistent.
(From OE-Core rev: 320585b7ff6340df0b0dbc63f95ed3ca8fc3a993)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
These functions ostensibly allowed parsing a recipe without bbappends
but this clearly hadn't been tested because a variable was unassigned in
both of them in that case.
(From OE-Core rev: d2bb9f08303bb120e811c03af2f5339e8f262cfa)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Sometimes, particularly if you extracted the source to /tmp which is on
tmpfs, the external source tree that is being pointed to may no longer
exist when you come to run "devtool build" or "devtool update-recipe"
etc. Make all of the commands that need to check for a recipe being in
the workspace call a single function and have that function additionally
check the source tree still exists where appropriate.
(From OE-Core rev: 0c3f289576a2ab35b1d1d8854d6763553cc3bf09)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Add a script to run "devtool modify" followed by a build on every target
recipe in the environment (with the option to skip/resume from/only
include specific recipes). This takes far too long to run as an
oe-selftest test but is still something that is useful to be able to
run. There's also a slightly quicker mode that just runs "devtool
extract" on each recipe.
(From OE-Core rev: 278f40cce14af430ac1743436132584eedfe792e)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Unfortunately it appears that under certain circumstances, a failed
git am followed by git am --abort won't clean up any changes the patch
might have made - this was seen when running "devtool extract" on the
unzip recipe; unzip-6.0_overflow3.diff has a malformed date as far as
git am is concerned but it triggers this condition. Add a
git reset --hard HEAD followed by git clean -f in order to recover from
this scenario.
(From OE-Core rev: 21fdbd76f458b70a6646dd6d0749e3a465ebd320)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The value of the deps varflag for tasks is (unusually) expected to be a
list object rather than a space-separated string, hence we cannot use
appendVarFlag() here. This fixes a traceback when parsing the gcc recipe
with externalsrc enabled, for example.
(From OE-Core rev: 47c1ff11a9b8b1e9f40ffb2b3d387252200cf0ec)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It turns out that there are folks out there who use externalsrc in
normal builds and don't really need to be warned; additionally within
the extensible SDK or when using devtool, it shouldn't be a warning
situation. Thus, scale it back to a note (we can't use bb.note() here
since that wouldn't actually be piped through to the bitbake UI). Also
touch up the message a little bit.
(From OE-Core rev: 87bedd137a77c5ac0033a1de4587c40dbe93e81d)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Tar has supported a --checkpoint option since version 1.15.91, so it
should be safe to use here to print dots showing that it's still doing
something (technically it's not really progress unless you know how many
dots it's going to print, which even it doesn't know at the start, but
it's better than nothing).
(From OE-Core rev: ee4aadd179be8141536f2fae16482683855a9a37)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This is not actually used for anything - I thought that we would need to
use it within devtool to set global configuration, but we're able to do
everything we need within the bbappends it creates, which also saves on
parse time. If we're not going to use work-config.inc let's just drop it
completely.
(From OE-Core rev: 84a1f82acd3b6ebb3c073aae6b996d2203dad2ce)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Provide the ability to define a function containing extra configuration
values to be added to the local.conf file that goes into the SDK. For
example, this could be used to set up SSTATE_MIRRORS within the SDK.
(From OE-Core rev: ef7001232ac2da8ee63ec568d1abba13e4fd4382)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If you ran the extensible SDK installer file with sh (instead of bash),
then the additional call to buildtools environment setup, extension of
PATH to support running devtool, and setting of OE_SKIP_SDK_CHECK
weren't being added to the end of the script. This is because apparently
bash is happy to expand wildcards in the target of a redirection, but
bash running in POSIX sh mode won't (although it apparently does work on
the sh command line rather than within a script run as an argument to
sh). In any case using a wildcard here is a bit of a crutch which we
don't need, so replace it with the proper path to the environment setup
script.
(From OE-Core rev: ba0f6b6ec32275329ebbb7c27f661c027b7a921d)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Variables such as SRC_URI which are space-separated may also contain
Python expressions (${@...}) which themselves contain spaces that
shouldn't be split when splitting the value into items. In order to
ensure this we need to use a custom splitting function instead of just
string.split().
This issue could be seen when doing "devtool modify sudo", adding a
commit to the resulting source repository then "devtool update-recipe" -
the Python expression in SRC_URI was being unnecessarily broken onto
multiple lines.
Fixes [YOCTO #8046].
(From OE-Core rev: bbec2ee98a08270c681189a6ba26beb1034d3e2f)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch was merged into the 4.8.7 release. This was missed on
upgrade, and we didn't notice because our quilt-based patch handling
code ignores already-applied patches.
(From OE-Core rev: 598c9660f26018a748a4749377389ced7eab2229)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
This is just rudimentary support at the moment as we'd potentially want
to compare the control files a bit more specifically than this does, but
it's a start.
(From OE-Core rev: 60564c6d6b8c1a3813baa04fb0d5597cf63f2a9f)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It is useful in a few different contexts to see which files have been
written out by an sstate task; break out a function that lets us get the
path to the manifest file easily.
(From OE-Core rev: 090196dd2d8f4306b34b239e78c39d37cc86034c)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Fixes the following error when running devtool from a directory other
than the build directory (or the SDK base path when using within the
extensible SDK):
The BBPATH variable is not set and bitbake did not find a
conf/bblayers.conf file in the expected location.
Maybe you accidentally invoked bitbake from the wrong directory?
(From OE-Core rev: 1687ec04bfee327fe24fdfecb67db689835769f2)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
If a recipe has been added to the workspace via "devtool add"
or "devtool upgrade" then the recipe file itself will be in the
workspace layer; if you run "devtool update-recipe" particularly in the
upgrade case you might think it would apply the upgrade to the original
recipe, but it will not - in order to remain consistent it has to update
the recipe that's in use which is the one in the workspace. Warn the
user in this situation so that they know what they need to do when they
are finished.
(From OE-Core rev: 4801b64243e57e554a593f0857dd53621d8f52e5)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Allow the _add_md5() function to be called with a directory in order to
recursively add the files under it. Additionally, we need to skip
preserving empty directories (since directories aren't listed in the md5
file).
(From OE-Core rev: 9383af78adc854a6f6de8b1520edf3cea0c477a6)
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Paul Eggleton